To give you a little perspective on age and time, you're not all that different from what I was when I was younger. I'm 6' 4" and 45 now. Back in college I was a typical gym warrior who assumed I would always be invincible. But no matter how much I ate I always weighed a consistent 206 to 210, my walk around body fat was always about 11 percent. I looked really good but couldn't put on mass. I was a very lean, classic hardgainer overtrainer. By the time I was in my mid to late 20's I was a comfortable high 2teens to 220’s. I didn't work out as much, still a lot but not as much and still looked good. When I hit my mid 30's I decided fuck it, let's see what I can really do if I try, before it's too late. I ate big but clean, I trained hard but smart and stuck to mostly high weight, low rep power lifting movements and did very hard HIIT training a couple times per week, including high velocity plyometrics. Over the next several years from about 35 to age 38/39 my weight slowly climbed from 220 to a very lean and very clean high 230's, sometimes low 240's. No gear, no sarms. Just big, clean eating and OTC whey, bcaa's. That's it. My point is, my body needed all those extra years for me to even be able to do that. I couldn't have gotten to that point from age 21 to age 25 even if I'd wanted to and trained differently, but I probably could have gotten to a clean and lean 230 by my late 20's if I'd trained smarter. Now at age 45 my goals are different. Now I cycle sarms and am very happy with that, I'm not as big as I was, I don't think my body could take the abuse now that I used to give it in the gym, but I'm a very healthy and lean 230. You can get what you want without steroids. I'm not saying don't, but if you're smart you're only few years from getting exactly what you want and still being at a young age, with another couple decades in front of you to think about steroids.