Join Evolutionary Forums


napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
sarms-forsale
needtobuildmuscle
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Nelson Montana and sarms suppression

  1. #11
    EVO V.I.P. Tazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    3,811
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    dylan covered you completely

  2. #12
    Moderator Mobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    27,864
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    I'd add to Dylan's comments 'when used at the recommended doses'

  3. #13
    Big Daddio Ricky V Rock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2000
    Posts
    5,759
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    This topic we have been addressing for years now on both the forums
    And the podcast.

    Some SARMS suppress and others donít, it really depends on why you are using and this is why you are here to learn the difference.

    Probably better thread to make is to ask about a specific compound and specific usage of such.
    Follow me on Social: http://www.RickyVRock.com/

    Follow me and ask me anything: http://www.BigRickRock.com/

    Check out the Evolutionary Radio Podcast: https://www.evolutionary.org/podcasts/

    Check out the EliteFitness Podcast: https://www.elitefitness.com/article...navar-profile/

  4. #14
    Moderator Mobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    27,864
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    To cite Montana do so correctly. He (as I refer to above) suggest that we run Sarms at a lower dose than we do Steroids. Should we, for example, run a Sarm at 300mg or more a week we'd see worse sides not better. This would include pretty bad suppression.

  5. #15
    EVO V.I.P. Tazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Posts
    3,811
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews

    Nelson Montana and sarms suppression

    Quote Originally Posted by Ricky V Rock View Post
    This topic we have been addressing for years now on both the forums
    And the podcast.

    Some SARMS suppress and others donít, it really depends on why you are using and this is why you are here to learn the difference.

    Probably better thread to make is to ask about a specific compound and specific usage of such.
    Bro check ur email...
    Last edited by Tazz; 04-27-2021 at 02:32 PM.

  6. #16
    Proficient Brother
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    129
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Biblical View Post
    I'm hoping that this thread doesn't turn into a crap fest because I know that has been happening lately whenever someone brings up Nelson and his opinions. But I'm looking for Iron clad blood work or evidence that shows whether sarms are suppressive or not, does anyone actually have that besides just rampant speculation
    Sarms are not as suppressive as steroids but they are suppressive, and that suppression increases with dosage and length of cycle. Rather than read ads/articles from places that want to sell you shit, you can find literally tons of independently conducted research studies that show this, and I mean you can find the actual published study results. You still need to pay attention to your hormones even if you are only using sarms, and this is especially true if your baseline T levels are in the moderate to marginal ranges already. Any website that implies "don't worry about it" simply wants your credit card info. They are (mostly) less suppressive than steroids but you still need to be aware of what you're doing.

  7. #17
    Moderator Mobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    27,864
    Supplement Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Source Reviews
    Read All Reviews
    Quote Originally Posted by Lawyerguy1 View Post
    Sarms are not as suppressive as steroids but they are suppressive, and that suppression increases with dosage and length of cycle. Rather than read ads/articles from places that want to sell you shit, you can find literally tons of independently conducted research studies that show this, and I mean you can find the actual published study results. You still need to pay attention to your hormones even if you are only using sarms, and this is especially true if your baseline T levels are in the moderate to marginal ranges already. Any website that implies "don't worry about it" simply wants your credit card info. They are (mostly) less suppressive than steroids but you still need to be aware of what you're doing.
    As per my reply above the dosing vs results vs sides issue is one Nelson did address. People argue about results on sarms being less than roids. But next to no one is trying the crazy doses we've seen (cough...cough... Bostin). I've a buck say we start running some at 500+ mg a week and see how the suppression starts to creep up.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •