I firmly believe that results with anabolics are more dose dependent, though some people do respond better than others to gear. But I'm not sure how much of it is exaggerated and over-hyped. But obviously true pharma grade anabolics are going to be far more potent than UGL gear. 200MG Pharma can equal 400MG UGL or more in some cases. So if they were to use a moderate dose of Test (lets say 2000MG/week) of pharma grade, that could equal 3000-4000MG/WK to us that utilize UGL Test.
Obviously diet has a HUGE part to do with how big they can get.. Then I look at their diets and they're absolutely horrifying and FAR off from the required calories to reach the weights they want to reach. Drugs only get you so far......BULLSHIT.... So obviously sometimes anabolics are far over-exaggerated, and in the process people forget about the importance of the other factors.
NOT TRUE. People that respond well to steroids leave everyone else in the dust. This last summer I decided to go on a little Tren experiment. I was at one point blasting almost 1g of Tren a week. I had ONE goal in mind TO CUT UP. I DID NOT WANT ANYMORE SIZE. I was 220 and eating around 3000 calories a day prior my cycle. WHen I added Tren I dropped down to sub 2000 a day which is WAY LOW. Did I cut up HELL YEAH but I GAINED SIZE. I ended that cycle at 226. I GAINED WEIGHT. Sorry...but if you have enough good QUALITY SAUCE diet is just iceing on the cake.
_
Last edited: