OK, you didn't put that in your Original Layout.
Ramping Up or Down with AAS Dosages is a Complete Waste of Time/Money, and AAS.
It's Complete "Bro-Science" and has No Basis of Fact in the Real World.
During a Cycle, you are trying to Maintain Stable Hormone Levels.
To do this you need to have a Basic Understanding of "Pharmacokinetics".
Pharmacokinetics - Sub-Branch of Pharmacology - study of the Processes of Absorption/Distribution/Metabolism.
And Elimination of Drugs within the Body. - (i.e.) - Half-Lives of AAS.
Your Second Misunderstanding ~ Masteron for Cutting.
Masteron is only Beneficial when your BF% is Below 10%.
Then it Shines.
Plus you're going to be doing Dbol which is going to Add to your BF% and increase Water Retention.
Bad Choice in my Estimation.
With such a Short Duration Cycle.
You need to Choose ~ Cutting Cycle or Bulking Cycle......................................... JP
P.S.
Don't know where you read that Ralox and Nolva work well together.
It is very important to note, however, that one study mentioned earlier (Birzniece et al. 2010) discovered that the
Testosterone stimulating effects of Raloxifene in comparison with Nolvadex, Raloxifene did fall quite significantly
short in comparison with Nolvadex in the effect of stimulating Testosterone production in men.
Other studies have also demonstrated that Raloxifene is indeed at a clear disadvantage with Nolvadex
(and even Toremifene) when it comes to the stimulation of endogenous Testosterone production in men[10].
It should therefore be clearly noted that between the choice of Raloxifene and Nolvadex for the purpose of Testosterone stimulation,
Nolvadex should be the preferred agent of the two. Time and time again, Nolvadex has demonstrated itself
against other SERMs throughout history and even today as the superior (and perhaps much cheaper)
choice not only for the purpose of stimulating endogenous Testosterone secretion, but for combating gynecomastia as well.