Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
sarms-forsaleUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsSarms for SaleUGFREAKeudomestic

Veteran Thread A rather large number of blind lab tests from various approved sources

Veteran Discussion

LittleTimeTrouble

Veteran Member
EVO V.I.P.
EVO Logger
These are fresh off the press. I sent them in blind to Janoshik for testing, and they came back to me today. They are from @domestic-supply.com, @~Vision~, @jasonhill800 and @OSGear Rep. I use D-S mostly, but sometimes go for a sale here or there, or a specific product. While I trust the sources here because I have used them, I don’t inherently trust the process of posting a test up on a sale website and assuming it represents what goes out to market. In a grocery store, yes, but this is a funny business, so I believe that our randomly testing of products we actually receive helps make this whole game safer for everybody.

Here are the rules:
1- if you have a question about a lot # dm me
2- all are within the 10% limit other than one which is like 1mg/ml too high, so none is a scam or a fake or better than others
3- I didn’t test anything and then hold it back
4- Everything was sent in blind. I didn’t tell them which compound to look for etc.
5- Janoshik promises results within 5%, so there is a margin of error.
6- These tests are just for these vials, and I presume these lots and dates. I don’t presume that record keeping is as good as Pfizer, so it may be that “lots” are not perfectly internally consistent.

https://janoshik.com/tests/34239-1_WMYKSVMNCD7M Beligas TestE 300 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34240-2_VVUWK967NBZ7 Ultima TestE 250 - OsG
https://janoshik.com/tests/34241-3_AUPIG9XHHFJW EuroPharm TestE 250 - PSL
https://janoshik.com/tests/34216-4_6LF59EE7C7PD Pharmaqo TestE 300 - Naps
https://janoshik.com/tests/34236-5_SAUXTTCI79K1 Pharmaqo Mast 200 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34237-6_V2ET2JTIWEM3 Beligas Mast 200 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34219-7_8Y4ULQ1TDIST Pharmacom Mix M - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34238-8_1R5ZJGHI7QB1 Ultima Mast 200 - Naps
https://janoshik.com/tests/34221-9_4UPEJVPHGJJX Pharmaqo Primo 175 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34222-10_H3QNL21VCA45 Ultima Primo 200 - OsG
 
To be clear and as a means of saving you loads of money in the future you've pretty proven that all our approved sources are where they need to be plus or minus a few mgs. I've seen the way forums have made a point of testing in the past. I'm think specifically of a former UK forum MuscleTalk where a group of lads ponied up a few bucks to get tests done.

Solid sources, as Stevesmi and I have debated on podcasts tend to stick around. Others are golden on day 1 but can, even within months of starting, fall off very quickly. You'll get the usual forum sponsor bias (one site says their sponsors are great and yours are crap etc). Labs can be skewed both by bias and occasional random mishaps (even lab tests get f**ked) but eventually quality will out.

One aspect I LOVE to see and would like to see regularly updated on my fave Mobster approved sources is UP TO DATE COA's. I'm good with a fraction under or over (although big pharma need to be ON POINT) as sometimes that seems more genuine from a UGL that a COA that seems too good to be true but I do wanna see, if I look at the product lists at least 1 recent lab analysis. Like as minimum 1 per month if at all possible
 
To be clear and as a means of saving you loads of money in the future you've pretty proven that all our approved sources are where they need to be plus or minus a few mgs. I've seen the way forums have made a point of testing in the past. I'm think specifically of a former UK forum MuscleTalk where a group of lads ponied up a few bucks to get tests done.

Solid sources, as Stevesmi and I have debated on podcasts tend to stick around. Others are golden on day 1 but can, even within months of starting, fall off very quickly. You'll get the usual forum sponsor bias (one site says their sponsors are great and yours are crap etc). Labs can be skewed both by bias and occasional random mishaps (even lab tests get f**ked) but eventually quality will out.

One aspect I LOVE to see and would like to see regularly updated on my fave Mobster approved sources is UP TO DATE COA's. I'm good with a fraction under or over (although big pharma need to be ON POINT) as sometimes that seems more genuine from a UGL that a COA that seems too good to be true but I do wanna see, if I look at the product lists at least 1 recent lab analysis. Like as minimum 1 per month if at all possible
I agree, though I would add that in a gray market, which is pretty much as unregulated a market as you get, testing from both sides, consumer and seller, is a great tool to keep the sellers honest and the consumers informed. Good sellers should welcome it because it will increase their market share and drive out bad actors more quickly.

I personally do it because my deal with my wife is I can do as I please, as long as I have tested what I am putting in my body, so she can sleep easier. Seems fair to me, even if it costs me some $$.
 
To be clear and as a means of saving you loads of money in the future you've pretty proven that all our approved sources are where they need to be plus or minus a few mgs. I've seen the way forums have made a point of testing in the past. I'm think specifically of a former UK forum MuscleTalk where a group of lads ponied up a few bucks to get tests done.

Solid sources, as Stevesmi and I have debated on podcasts tend to stick around. Others are golden on day 1 but can, even within months of starting, fall off very quickly. You'll get the usual forum sponsor bias (one site says their sponsors are great and yours are crap etc). Labs can be skewed both by bias and occasional random mishaps (even lab tests get f**ked) but eventually quality will out.

One aspect I LOVE to see and would like to see regularly updated on my fave Mobster approved sources is UP TO DATE COA's. I'm good with a fraction under or over (although big pharma need to be ON POINT) as sometimes that seems more genuine from a UGL that a COA that seems too good to be true but I do wanna see, if I look at the product lists at least 1 recent lab analysis. Like as minimum 1 per month if at all possible
What I would like to see is more testing of ancillaries. I think people presume they are all on point because they are not really controlled substances, but they are also strong drugs and often in such small doses that a little bit off is problematic.
 
this is why i recommend domestic supply
the shipping is fast
its domestic
and the gear is g2g.

this thread made my day.
The biggest differentiator between D-S and everybody else is the speed and efficiency of the product. They aren’t the cheapest, and there are things they don’t have, but Greg knows his business, and that is getting the best stuff out the fastest.

Also worth noting that people often ask, “how is Pharmaqo?” Well, I’ve now tested three different products from two different sources, and the test and mast were within 1 mg/ml, and the 175 Primo is consistently at 185, both from my testing and other reports including blind tests. Things can always change, and I know people have seen some weird blood tests from time to time, but to me it looks as good as it gets.
 
These are fresh off the press. I sent them in blind to Janoshik for testing, and they came back to me today. They are from @domestic-supply.com, @~Vision~, @jasonhill800 and @OSGear Rep. I use D-S mostly, but sometimes go for a sale here or there, or a specific product. While I trust the sources here because I have used them, I don’t inherently trust the process of posting a test up on a sale website and assuming it represents what goes out to market. In a grocery store, yes, but this is a funny business, so I believe that our randomly testing of products we actually receive helps make this whole game safer for everybody.

Here are the rules:
1- if you have a question about a lot # dm me
2- all are within the 10% limit other than one which is like 1mg/ml too high, so none is a scam or a fake or better than others
3- I didn’t test anything and then hold it back
4- Everything was sent in blind. I didn’t tell them which compound to look for etc.
5- Janoshik promises results within 5%, so there is a margin of error.
6- These tests are just for these vials, and I presume these lots and dates. I don’t presume that record keeping is as good as Pfizer, so it may be that “lots” are not perfectly internally consistent.

https://janoshik.com/tests/34239-1_WMYKSVMNCD7M Beligas TestE 300 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34240-2_VVUWK967NBZ7 Ultima TestE 250 - OsG
https://janoshik.com/tests/34241-3_AUPIG9XHHFJW EuroPharm TestE 250 - PSL
https://janoshik.com/tests/34216-4_6LF59EE7C7PD Pharmaqo TestE 300 - Naps
https://janoshik.com/tests/34236-5_SAUXTTCI79K1 Pharmaqo Mast 200 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34237-6_V2ET2JTIWEM3 Beligas Mast 200 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34219-7_8Y4ULQ1TDIST Pharmacom Mix M - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34238-8_1R5ZJGHI7QB1 Ultima Mast 200 - Naps
https://janoshik.com/tests/34221-9_4UPEJVPHGJJX Pharmaqo Primo 175 - DS
https://janoshik.com/tests/34222-10_H3QNL21VCA45 Ultima Primo 200 - OsG
@LittleTimeTrouble i cant open any of these and site blocks external links for many users

can you please print screen them and post up the pictures for us bro
 
@LittleTimeTrouble i cant open any of these and site blocks external links for many users

can you please print screen them and post up the pictures for us bro
You’ll have to cross reference the numbers on the tests with the numbers, 1-10, above for identification.
 

Attachments

  • Test Report #34239.png
    Test Report #34239.png
    193.5 KB · Views: 47
  • Test Report #34238.png
    Test Report #34238.png
    195.2 KB · Views: 43
  • Test Report #34241.png
    Test Report #34241.png
    194 KB · Views: 43
  • Test Report #34221.png
    Test Report #34221.png
    193.1 KB · Views: 37
  • Test Report #34216.png
    Test Report #34216.png
    193.1 KB · Views: 38
  • Test Report #34219.png
    Test Report #34219.png
    201.9 KB · Views: 38
  • Test Report #34236.png
    Test Report #34236.png
    194.8 KB · Views: 38
  • Test Report #34240.png
    Test Report #34240.png
    195.5 KB · Views: 37
  • Test Report #34237.png
    Test Report #34237.png
    193.7 KB · Views: 31
  • Test Report #34222.png
    Test Report #34222.png
    193.7 KB · Views: 39
nice work littletimetrouble
volunteering your time to clarify this information is great for the site
 
no doubt in my mind the gear is good on here
now we have proof and nobody can say otherwise
 
and not only testing the gear like this is something that no other Forum can say they do
on here we only push legitimate steroids and this is the proof
 
This thread/post was reviewed by our Medical Review board.

This thread/post/message was also fact checked by Steven Darwin, MD and our medical review board.

Full editorial process was followed, and please read our medical disclaimer, check our editorial process.
 
all our brands and sponsors on here are the GOAT
no wonder we've had so many successful transformations
 
next step for many of you is putting up a log and using this incredibly awesome gear
even things like Primo are testing legit that is a great sign
 
this is exactly why I use our forum sponsors for my cycles when i am prepping
I have an edge on my opponents because I'm actually using properly dosed gear
 
Back
Top Bottom