For some years Dorian Yates can be found to talk in a statement like way about some aspects of PEDs, nutrition and especially training. When I say 'statement' he makes it seem as though there is little to no argument to what has been said. I'll list them when I see them. Feel free to argue back
Here's the first:
You hold back when you do more than 1 work set.
Now that MUST be true. If you went balls out on the first set you'd take as long as said muscle might need to recover. That might be days. He used the example of four work sets (let's say chest).
Now he also makes the above point by inferring that if you had NO CHOICE but to do one set you'd pour everything into it. Now again that's also kinda obvious.
The question or, better, suggestion is that one set - done full bore and to failure - is enough to stimulate growth. Now I'll point out that on occasion he did 2 work sets and only at the very end of his career did he do one work set per exercise but did also do 2-3 movements per bodypart
Here's No2
Pulldowns
Don't do wide grip or similar but, instead, do the hands close together palms towards you version. Two reasons - the additional carry over strength from the biceps allowing for greater inroad into the lat being worked. The other is the pulling down and back (similar to pullovers at the bottom and so more directly hitting the lats) of the elbow and upper arms. The trick, not mentioned, is to not have the hands too close together. For myself, if I give it a try, close would be somewhat difficult anyway as I'm not surer I have the flexibility anymore nor could I get my elbows back far enough to do it justice.
There's an argument to be made that said style of training is so god damned brutal it's just too hard to do regularly.
Here's the first:
You hold back when you do more than 1 work set.
Now that MUST be true. If you went balls out on the first set you'd take as long as said muscle might need to recover. That might be days. He used the example of four work sets (let's say chest).
Now he also makes the above point by inferring that if you had NO CHOICE but to do one set you'd pour everything into it. Now again that's also kinda obvious.
The question or, better, suggestion is that one set - done full bore and to failure - is enough to stimulate growth. Now I'll point out that on occasion he did 2 work sets and only at the very end of his career did he do one work set per exercise but did also do 2-3 movements per bodypart
Here's No2
Pulldowns
Don't do wide grip or similar but, instead, do the hands close together palms towards you version. Two reasons - the additional carry over strength from the biceps allowing for greater inroad into the lat being worked. The other is the pulling down and back (similar to pullovers at the bottom and so more directly hitting the lats) of the elbow and upper arms. The trick, not mentioned, is to not have the hands too close together. For myself, if I give it a try, close would be somewhat difficult anyway as I'm not surer I have the flexibility anymore nor could I get my elbows back far enough to do it justice.
There's an argument to be made that said style of training is so god damned brutal it's just too hard to do regularly.