Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Mattdogg
EVO V.I.P
Yeah the changing direction of this country is what the fuck the main problem is. Been shit since the 80s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah the changing direction of this country is what the fuck the main problem is. Been shit since the 80s.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
keep the stuff out of other peoples houses if they don't know.. it aint cool to get others jammed up if you're using..
if you're still living with mom & dad and juicing, than put the vial down and pick up a book, study, get a career,, get out on your own, and do your thing like a grown adult.. If you have to hide it from mommy and daddy than I would reevaluate your life decisions and where you are heading..Now you got caught, now comes the making up lies and blowing smoke up their asses when they provide for you under their roof?!?!
E32038
EVO V.I.P.
So your point is Socrates saw millennials coming in 390bc? Lmao
Satan62
New member
So-by a technicality he's living with his parents? When you're visiting for several months that is not living with them, that is technically just "visiting"? So I guess all rules don't apply to the respect of people's households during visitation... If someone is "staying" at another household, have respect for the boundaries and be a grown adult and know right from wrong.. if you have to hide something, then you know it's wrong and be prepared to deal with the ramifications for your actions..
E32038
EVO V.I.P.
Totally on point here Vision. Good post
Well, Vision, although I merely assumed the role of messenger vis-a-vis Catfish170's post, I will say that, in light of the fact that he is obviously self-supportive, it shouldn't matter what he did in his parent's house as long as it does not negatively affect said house. Hell, it may very well be that he felt an obligation to visit; an obligation that happened to have coincided with his desire to run a cycle over the summer. If so, what was he to do, not run the cycle, or not visit his parent?
Per your "...be a grown adult and know right from wrong," you know as well as what I do that there isn't really a goddamn thing wrong with AAS. You know that society's negative attitude towards anabolic steroids is born of ignorance and hypocrisy. Moreover, you deal the crap! Do you not understand that society deems what you do to be very wrong? Of course you undertsand that obvious fact. So you, of all people, should be supportive of Catfish.
No, not at all. My point is that certain members of each generation throughout the totality of human history have castigated the members of succeeding generations. Quoting Socrates is simply an effective way of demonstrating the generational blame game; a game that many millennials will eventually and sadly come to play.
E32038
EVO V.I.P.
I knew what you meant bro. I was being facetious.
Yeah, I kinda thought that. But I wasn't certain.
- - - Updated - - -
Holeshot!!!
E32038
EVO V.I.P.
It's all good.....I've heard that before and every generation does actually say it about the last. But we all have to admit the millennial have taken the cake. They have been coddled, spoiled, given safe spaces, etc.... that has not happened with any other generation to my recollection. Not in the US anyway. i'm not saying all millennials. And I will say, much of this is propagated by the media, I am sure. And a small select few. Like the occupy wallstreet fucktards.
For fucks sake
I'll bite..
Yes in "our" like-minded approach to AAS I agree that 99.9% of us here in these communities and/or gyms for that matter that use AAS see little to no hazards with them for personal use (with the occasional health concerns, situation depending)..However, where we both lack to have the same common grounds and similar perspective is in which fashion he has decided to use his PED's..Unless he has a prescription, they are not "deemed" wrong, in fact that are out right ILLEGAL in some regions (That's my objective opinion)..The procurement of PED's is irrelevant when comparing ones subjective opinion when you should place into great consideration and acknowledgment not only your local laws and ordinances, but ACCOUNTABILITY!
I can own a candy store, but that won't stop me from selling a fat girl a snickers bar..
Where I am in life today, at this moment I couldn't possibly think of bringing a controlled substance with needles into the home of one of my loved ones unbeknownst to them, that's morally wrong and unethical..In some households, even between spouses it may be an elephant in the room with someone using PED's, but to blatantly sneak something under the radar of someones else roof with a clear conscience (what you're advocating) should be tolerated and viewed as "acceptable" because of his cycle timing?
With that approach, you might as well fart peas at the moon before you attempt to convince me that his actions should be justified due to cycle timing and his parents discovery of his gear!
Sneaking,getting caught, than lying about screams problematic.. That's 3 circumstances that tells me his situation is NOT ideal to any of ours, or our like-minded opinions on PED's..Nor am I convinced that anyone for that matter is entitled!
My opinion is NOT to defend or convince, but rather be open minded with situational awareness..I'd like to believe that I'm far from narrow minded, and I do my best not to be fooled by what I see/read on the outside, because on the inside there may be a different story!
Stay Woke (I always wanted to use that moronic saying hahaha)
E32038
EVO V.I.P.
Oh my. And what a moronic saying it is. I want to grab anyone that says that and yell “it is stay awake, not stay woke”.
I think you meant that “every generation does actually say it about the next” generation.
But, yes, although I think that the present slicing up of the populace into smaller generational slices of vilification and entitlement is more pronounced than ever before, the generational blame game has been in play since at least the beginning of hunter-gatherer societies, or perhaps even from the beginning of humankind 6-7 million years ago.
But that is exactly the way in which many members of both the “G.I. Generation” and the “Silent Generation” described we Baby Boomers during the 60s, 70s, 80s and beyond. They also claimed that we had “a huge sense of entitlement” (as if nearly all white people of all generations do not harbor a huge sense of entitlement); and that we were lazy, unmotivated, unappreciative, etc., etc., etc.
I think that your “not to my recollection” is key here, E. For, as it relates to their military service, members of the G.I. Generation as well as early members of the Silent Generation were very well cared for by, of all things, the federal government. White male WWII veterans of these two generations - known collectively as “The Greatest Generation” - received free college educations - with generous stipends, free medical care, low interest government-guaranteed home loans, and more than $9 billion worth of unemployment benefits between the years 1944 and 1949. (Technically speaking, black male and white female WWII veterans were also eligible for these programs, but they were nearly always discriminated against and thus denied said benefits.)
So the simple fact of the matter is that this “Greatest Generation” was the most heavily subsidized generation in American history.
As a Baby Boomer who participated in both the Occupy Los Angeles encampment and the Occupy Portland (Oregon) encampment, I will argue that that uprising had been percolating since the Reagan administration fired striking air traffic controllers in 1981 (after Reagan himself lied to them by pretending to be on their side).
Then, on September 17, 2011, a group of (mostly) millennials decided to take direct action. And this action struck a raw nerve, sending a shock wave throughout the U.S., because what these millennials were doing was what tens of millions of people wished they could do. The people who had lost their jobs, their homes, their “American dream” - they cathartically cheered on this ragtag bunch of millennials who got right in the face of Wall Street and said, “We’re not leaving until you give us our country back!”
“Fucktards”? If they were, then so, too, were the participants of the Boston Tea Party “fucktards,” for to possess a contextual understanding of both events is to understand that the Boston Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street unfolded for much of the same type of reasons.
ur problem is?
Perhaps Al5920's "problem," PureFew, is the fact that you are far too thin-skinned. Like, for example, when you weirded out over my having written "And the Kidd scores another Holeshot" when it quite obviously had noting to do with you just as surely as stevesmi does not owe you an apology. Thicken it, bro. Thicken it!
i simply asked what u meant by "and the kidd scores another holeshot" never got angry what so ever at that comment, and u said it was an inside joke that u used to say so how on earth is anybody going to know what u meant by the comment. having the manners to apologising is nothing but respect and can leave both of us on a positive page with us both knowing we now good and cool together
In actuality, Purefew, you also wrote something to the effect of "...was that meant to insult me?" So, in point of fact, you were freaked out over it. It may be likened to your having demanded an apology from stevesmi even though he wrote absolutely nothing that could have been accurately construed as being insulting toward you.
So, no, an apology will not be forthcoming from me either, because, much like Steve, I owe you no such thing.
So, again, brah, thicken it!
Similar threads
