Got caught

[PureFew]

In actuality, Purefew, you also wrote something to the effect of "...was that meant to insult me?" So, in point of fact, you were freaked out over it. It may be likened to your having demanded an apology from stevesmi even though he wrote absolutely nothing that could have been accurately construed as being insulting toward you.
So, no, an apology will not be forthcoming from me either, because, much like Steve, I owe you no such thing.

So, again, brah, thicken it!

me asking "was that meant to insult me?" was legit asking if that was meant to insult me, i dont know about u but asking that simple question is not freaking out, if u had more social interactions other than urself u would understand such a simple question does not mean i was freaking out.

steve wrote about this generation and knowing my age he would have been refering to my age range so the fact that he brought it up felt as if it was directed towards me and if u read i never saw that he responsed and after knowing what his intentions were and how they were not targeted at me i said forget what i just said meaning i was no longer looking for an apology. but if he never responded to what i had writen and if he never explained what he fully meant i believe that out of respect and comman manners that an apology would have been nice, never said it was mandatory but would have been nice or to at least agloledge what i had said.

i also never expect an apology from u nor did i even ask but the simple fact that u told me the meaning of the comment helped me understand that it was infact not an insult there for i had no reason to freak out and which i never hence why i asked if it was an insult or not.

 

[E32038]

I think you meant that “every generation does actually say it about the next” generation.
But, yes, although I think that the present slicing up of the populace into smaller generational slices of vilification and entitlement is more pronounced than ever before, the generational blame game has been in play since at least the beginning of hunter-gatherer societies, or perhaps even from the beginning of humankind 6-7 million years ago.




But that is exactly the way in which many members of both the “G.I. Generation” and the “Silent Generation” described we Baby Boomers during the 60s, 70s, 80s and beyond. They also claimed that we had “a huge sense of entitlement” (as if nearly all white people of all generations do not harbor a huge sense of entitlement); and that we were lazy, unmotivated, unappreciative, etc., etc., etc.




I think that your “not to my recollection” is key here, E. For, as it relates to their military service, members of the G.I. Generation as well as early members of the Silent Generation were very well cared for by, of all things, the federal government. White male WWII veterans of these two generations - known collectively as “The Greatest Generation” - received free college educations - with generous stipends, free medical care, low interest government-guaranteed home loans, and more than $9 billion worth of unemployment benefits between the years 1944 and 1949. (Technically speaking, black male and white female WWII veterans were also eligible for these programs, but they were nearly always discriminated against and thus denied said benefits.)
So the simple fact of the matter is that this “Greatest Generation” was the most heavily subsidized generation in American history.



As a Baby Boomer who participated in both the Occupy Los Angeles encampment and the Occupy Portland (Oregon) encampment, I will argue that that uprising had been percolating since the Reagan administration fired striking air traffic controllers in 1981 (after Reagan himself lied to them by pretending to be on their side).
Then, on September 17, 2011, a group of (mostly) millennials decided to take direct action. And this action struck a raw nerve, sending a shock wave throughout the U.S., because what these millennials were doing was what tens of millions of people wished they could do. The people who had lost their jobs, their homes, their “American dream” - they cathartically cheered on this ragtag bunch of millennials who got right in the face of Wall Street and said, “We’re not leaving until you give us our country back!”
“Fucktards”? If they were, then so, too, were the participants of the Boston Tea Party “fucktards,” for to possess a contextual understanding of both events is to understand that the Boston Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street unfolded for much of the same type of reasons.

I will concede to all you said. I agree. Except, I cannot compare taxation without representation with the occupy movement. Otherwise, I am in your camp brother. And love that your post was well thought out! Well played, sir.

 

[Catfish170]

Don’t pretend like you hide the fact that you do AAS. I’m pretty sure almost 90% of the people in this forum that does AAS hide it from others, not that many people are open to admitting they’re not natural. And don’t you technically work for an organization that sells illegal substances to whoever will pay?

- - - Updated - - -

He’s making it seem as if I were doing cocaine, meth or heroin at my parents house. I just made this post as a “getting caught is a risk” post so others could see my experience and maybe reconsider. Either way thanks for being one of the few who isn’t criticizing me.

 

[Satan62]

Don’t hide it. Then it isn’t a worry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Eddie Haskell]

me asking "was that meant to insult me?" was legit asking if that was meant to insult me, i dont know about u but asking that simple question is not freaking out, if u had more social interactions other than urself u would understand such a simple question does not mean i was freaking out.

steve wrote about this generation and knowing my age he would have been refering to my age range so the fact that he brought it up felt as if it was directed towards me and if u read i never saw that he responsed and after knowing what his intentions were and how they were not targeted at me i said forget what i just said meaning i was no longer looking for an apology. but if he never responded to what i had writen and if he never explained what he fully meant i believe that out of respect and comman manners that an apology would have been nice, never said it was mandatory but would have been nice or to at least agloledge what i had said.

i also never expect an apology from u nor did i even ask but the simple fact that u told me the meaning of the comment helped me understand that it was infact not an insult there for i had no reason to freak out and which i never hence why i asked if it was an insult or not.

All right, man, whatever you say. We'll wait and see how you interact with others going forward. I have a suspicion that you're thin-skinned ways will continue on. But we'll see. Be well.

 

[Eddie Haskell]

I will concede to all you said. I agree. Except, I cannot compare taxation without representation with the Occupy movement. Otherwise, I am in your camp, brother.

If we are to view the Boston Tea Party from the perspective presented by popular culture - the school textbook version if you will, then, yes, the two events would share much less common. But there is much to the story of the Boston Tea Party than what we were taught in school. For the Boston Tea Party concerned much more than mere taxation to the crown without representation.

The Boston Tea Party was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company (BEIC), by far the largest trans-national corporation then in existence; tax cuts that were motivated by the fact that the BEIC had made some horrific business decisions that nearly sent the company into bankruptcy. It was a corporate tax cut that threatened to decimate small Colonial businesses by helping the BEIC pull a Wal-Mart against small entrepreneurial tea shops, and individuals began a revolt that kicked-off a series of events that ended in the creation of the United States.

They covered their faces, massed in the streets, and destroyed the property of a giant global corporation much the same way as modern-day anarchists have destroyed property during various World Trade Organization meetings, i.e., Seattle, Washington in 1999.
Declaring an end to global trade run by the BEIC that was destroying local economies, this small, masked minority started a revolution with an act of rebellion later called the Boston Tea Party.

One of the most obvious similarities between the Boston Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street movement is the fact that, much like the BEIC, U.S. banks the likes of J.P. Morgan Chase made horrible business decisions that nearly broke them. And, also much like the BEIC, U.S. banks, automobile manufacturers and other industries were bailed out in 2007-2008 to the tune of some $700 billion, while homeowners, unjustly indebted college students and millions of other workers were left to twist in the wind just like the American colonialists in the wake of the BEIC’s bailout. Hence the Occupy Wall Street movement was born.

Indeed, the Occupy Wall Street chant “Banks got bailed out! We got sold out!” was not much different from the sentiments expressed by the participants of the Boston Tea Party - those who would later become revolutionaries.

And love that your post was well thought out! Well played, sir.

Thank you, E.

Good evening

 

[~Vision~]

Don’t hide it. Then it isn’t a worry.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bingo... get on TRT... case closed!

people dont ask what I'm on because its clear enough..

 

[Satan62]

Yep, TRT does have some side benefits!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Mobster]

Don’t pretend like you hide the fact that you do AAS. I’m pretty sure almost 90% of the people in this forum that does AAS hide it from others, not that many people are open to admitting they’re not natural. And don’t you technically work for an organization that sells illegal substances to whoever will pay?

- - - Updated - - -

He’s making it seem as if I were doing cocaine, meth or heroin at my parents house. I just made this post as a “getting caught is a risk” post so others could see my experience and maybe reconsider. Either way thanks for being one of the few who isn’t criticizing me.

Most but not all forum members are based in the US (largest market for PED's obvs). Others are not. We've Indian members who can just walk in a pharmacy and buy them with no script. Others, like me and the Canadians, who can posses lawfully. What we have seen is guys, not just those in relationships and or living with someone but guys married for years who cannot tell their wives they use. Think about that. They professed undying eternal love in front of witnesses but fuck telling that bitch their using a steroid. Ditto, as in your case, a parent.

I've also addressed the sponsor issue. You wouldn't have been able to ask the question if, as with ALL the forums you could have posted on, we didn't have paid advertizers. Obviously it's not gonna be Coca-Cola is it lol. If only. So yes on a forum where you get to ask about keeping your steroid use hidden from mum and dad it's gonna be sponsors that sell that sort of thing. Feel free to talk about smoking a joint on a cannabis growers forum but don't be shocked or surprised if the have promos from sellers of grow lights, feed and so on.

Finally - work? LOLOLOLOL. I'm a mod and I don't get paid SH*T. Not a fkin buck.

 

[Eddie Haskell]

E32038:"I will concede to all you said. I agree. Except, I cannot compare taxation without representation with the Occupy movement. Otherwise, I am in your camp, brother."


If we are to view the Boston Tea Party from the perspective presented by popular culture - the school textbook version if you will, then, yes, the two events would share much less common. But there is much to the story of the Boston Tea Party than what we were taught in school. For the Boston Tea Party concerned much more than mere taxation to the crown without representation.

The Boston Tea Party was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company (BEIC), by far the largest trans-national corporation then in existence; tax cuts that were motivated by the fact that the BEIC had made some horrific business decisions that nearly sent the company into bankruptcy. It was a corporate tax cut that threatened to decimate small Colonial businesses by helping the BEIC pull a Wal-Mart against small entrepreneurial tea shops, and individuals began a revolt that kicked-off a series of events that ended in the creation of the United States.

They covered their faces, massed in the streets, and destroyed the property of a giant global corporation much the same way as modern-day anarchists have destroyed property during various World Trade Organization meetings, i.e., Seattle, Washington in 1999.
Declaring an end to global trade run by the BEIC that was destroying local economies, this small, masked minority started a revolution with an act of rebellion later called the Boston Tea Party.

One of the most obvious similarities between the Boston Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street movement is the fact that, much like the BEIC, U.S. banks the likes of J.P. Morgan Chase made horrible business decisions that nearly broke them. And, also much like the BEIC, U.S. banks, automobile manufacturers and other industries were bailed out in 2007-2008 to the tune of some $700 billion, while homeowners, unjustly indebted college students and millions of other workers were left to twist in the wind just like the American colonialists in the wake of the BEIC’s bailout. Hence the Occupy Wall Street movement was born.

Indeed, the Occupy Wall Street chant “Banks got bailed out! We got sold out!” was not much different from the sentiments expressed by the participants of the Boston Tea Party - those who would later become revolutionaries.


E32038:"And love that your post was well thought out! Well played, sir."

Thank you, E.

****

Might that make sense to you, E?

 

[stevesmi]

^^^ I agree, it is ridiculous that these people gambled big $$$$ to get rich. and the ones who bet right, became filthy rich and the ones who bet wrong got bailed out and continued their careers like nothing happened. plus those same failed CEO's are walking away with millions in golden parachutes.

the rest of us who got fucked in the housing bubble get peanuts and ruined credit scores in the process.

 

[Eddie Haskell]

^^^ I agree, it is ridiculous that these people gambled big $$$$ to get rich. and the ones who bet right, became filthy rich and the ones who bet wrong got bailed out and continued their careers like nothing happened. plus those same failed CEO's are walking away with millions in golden parachutes.

the rest of us who got fucked in the housing bubble get peanuts and ruined credit scores in the process.

Precisely, Steve. Precisely! And it was the things you mentioned that served as the basis for the Millennial-led Occupy Wall Street movement.

"Banks got bailed out! We got sold out[/fucked]!"

 

[E32038]

E32038:"I will concede to all you said. I agree. Except, I cannot compare taxation without representation with the Occupy movement. Otherwise, I am in your camp, brother."


If we are to view the Boston Tea Party from the perspective presented by popular culture - the school textbook version if you will, then, yes, the two events would share much less common. But there is much to the story of the Boston Tea Party than what we were taught in school. For the Boston Tea Party concerned much more than mere taxation to the crown without representation.

The Boston Tea Party was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company (BEIC), by far the largest trans-national corporation then in existence; tax cuts that were motivated by the fact that the BEIC had made some horrific business decisions that nearly sent the company into bankruptcy. It was a corporate tax cut that threatened to decimate small Colonial businesses by helping the BEIC pull a Wal-Mart against small entrepreneurial tea shops, and individuals began a revolt that kicked-off a series of events that ended in the creation of the United States.

They covered their faces, massed in the streets, and destroyed the property of a giant global corporation much the same way as modern-day anarchists have destroyed property during various World Trade Organization meetings, i.e., Seattle, Washington in 1999.
Declaring an end to global trade run by the BEIC that was destroying local economies, this small, masked minority started a revolution with an act of rebellion later called the Boston Tea Party.

One of the most obvious similarities between the Boston Tea Party and the Occupy Wall Street movement is the fact that, much like the BEIC, U.S. banks the likes of J.P. Morgan Chase made horrible business decisions that nearly broke them. And, also much like the BEIC, U.S. banks, automobile manufacturers and other industries were bailed out in 2007-2008 to the tune of some $700 billion, while homeowners, unjustly indebted college students and millions of other workers were left to twist in the wind just like the American colonialists in the wake of the BEIC’s bailout. Hence the Occupy Wall Street movement was born.

Indeed, the Occupy Wall Street chant “Banks got bailed out! We got sold out!” was not much different from the sentiments expressed by the participants of the Boston Tea Party - those who would later become revolutionaries.


E32038:"And love that your post was well thought out! Well played, sir."

Thank you, E.

****

Might that make sense to you, E?

I can’t disagree with you, Eddie. And I hate the banks and other companies got bailed out and we all got fucked. This is why I prefer less government and more allowing the states to handle their shit. Keep the feds out of it.

 

[Eddie Haskell]

I can’t disagree with you, Eddie. And I hate the banks and other companies got bailed out and we all got fucked. This is why I prefer less government and more allowing the states to handle their shit. Keep the feds out of it.

All right. But surely you understand that it was a lack of government that created the crisis to begin with. Surely you recall that it was the federal government's elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 that led to the wild speculation within the housing market and other aspects of the economy.
Too, it was the lack of government law enforcement that allowed thousands of banking capitalists to get away with the many crimes they committed toward the creation of said crisis in 2007-2008. Contarast that with the fact that even the Reagan administration prosecuted and imprisoned approximately 700 banking capitalists in the wake of the 1980's Savings & Loan scandal, and that Reagan effectively nationalized the entire industry in response. In other words, Ronald Reagan, someone that you likely admire, E, brought a great deal of "big government" down in the likes of Charles Keating and for very good reason.

 

[gashred777]

All right. But surely you understand that it was a lack of government that created the crisis to begin with. Surely you recall that it was the federal government's elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 that led to the wild speculation within the housing market and other aspects of the economy.
Too, it was the lack of government law enforcement that allowed thousands of banking capitalists to get away with the many crimes they committed toward the creation of said crisis in 2007-2008. Contarast that with the fact that even the Reagan administration prosecuted and imprisoned approximately 700 banking capitalists in the wake of the 1980's Savings & Loan scandal, and that Reagan effectively nationalized the entire industry in response. In other words, Ronald Reagan, someone that you likely admire, E, brought a great deal of "big government" down in the likes of Charles Keating and for very good reason.

Eddie- not related to this topic.....

You recommended a site where you get needles (BD). Which ones do you use specifically for withdrawing, and then injecting? Just trust your recommendation after seeing your countless posts on here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[~Vision~]

All right. But surely you understand that it was a lack of government that created the crisis to begin with. Surely you recall that it was the federal government's elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 that led to the wild speculation within the housing market and other aspects of the economy.
Too, it was the lack of government law enforcement that allowed thousands of banking capitalists to get away with the many crimes they committed toward the creation of said crisis in 2007-2008. Contarast that with the fact that even the Reagan administration prosecuted and imprisoned approximately 700 banking capitalists in the wake of the 1980's Savings & Loan scandal, and that Reagan effectively nationalized the entire industry in response. In other words, Ronald Reagan, someone that you likely admire, E, brought a great deal of "big government" down in the likes of Charles Keating and for very good reason.

A breath of fresh air.. someone that at least gets it!!!

You wanna read a good book? Read "Rich Dad - Poor Dad"

 

[E32038]

All right. But surely you understand that it was a lack of government that created the crisis to begin with. Surely you recall that it was the federal government's elimination of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 that led to the wild speculation within the housing market and other aspects of the economy.
Too, it was the lack of government law enforcement that allowed thousands of banking capitalists to get away with the many crimes they committed toward the creation of said crisis in 2007-2008. Contarast that with the fact that even the Reagan administration prosecuted and imprisoned approximately 700 banking capitalists in the wake of the 1980's Savings & Loan scandal, and that Reagan effectively nationalized the entire industry in response. In other words, Ronald Reagan, someone that you likely admire, E, brought a great deal of "big government" down in the likes of Charles Keating and for very good reason.

I do not remember the Glass Steagall act of 99. Back then, I didn't give a shit about that stuff, I was just getting out of the Marines and had other issues to worry about. I served under Bill Clinton and yes, I did like Reagan but was really too young to know back then. I'm a big "trust buy verify" guy. I am a big supporter of whatever President is in office, because I am an American and love my country. Going against any President in my opinion is just not good for the country. I'm not really a political guy and I'm a libertarian at heart if I had to self-identify. Socially democratic, fiscally republican leaning. Just live and let live is how I prefer to live. And outside of buying juice, I am pretty straight laced...lol. Hell, I don't even speed! Also proud to say I didn't vote in the last US election. I couldn't bring myself to it. The best thing that came out of that is no jury duty for the next 4 years. I have learned a lot reading your recent posts on all this stuff. I gotta say, I appreciate it. Thank you.

 

[~Vision~]

I do not remember the Glass Steagall act of 99. Back then, I didn't give a shit about that stuff, I was just getting out of the Marines and had other issues to worry about. I served under Bill Clinton and yes, I did like Reagan but was really too young to know back then. I'm a big "trust buy verify" guy. I am a big supporter of whatever President is in office, because I am an American and love my country. Going against any President in my opinion is just not good for the country. I'm not really a political guy and I'm a libertarian at heart if I had to self-identify. Socially democratic, fiscally republican leaning. Just live and let live is how I prefer to live. And outside of buying juice, I am pretty straight laced...lol. Hell, I don't even speed! Also proud to say I didn't vote in the last US election. I couldn't bring myself to it. The best thing that came out of that is no jury duty for the next 4 years. I have learned a lot reading your recent posts on all this stuff. I gotta say, I appreciate it. Thank you.

I can definitely relate to you on living the straight-laced life, a clear conscience feels pretty good when I sleep at night.. if my side of the street is clean, half of the load is off my shoulders and I can worry about other legit life stressors..

And I agree, a lot of his recent posts were definitely refreshing and they speak my language.. but I try to avoid political conversations because even with people that speak the same language somewhere somehow disagreements become tangents... But he was on point with his most recent post!!

 

[Eddie Haskell]

Eddie- not related to this topic.....

You recommended a site where you get needles (BD). Which ones do you use specifically for withdrawing, and then injecting? Just trust your recommendation after seeing your countless posts on here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Hey, how dare you bring this thread back to the topic of AAS and related topics, gashred777! ;-)

Anyway, I always draw with a 20g. Per injecting, and save for when I'm jacking something that is in excess of 300mgs, which I rarely do, I use a 22g.

 

[gashred777]

Hey, how dare you bring this thread back to the topic of AAS and related topics, gashred777! ;-)

Anyway, I always draw with a 20g. Per injecting, and save for when I'm jacking something that is in excess of 300mgs, which I rarely do, I use a 22g.

Lol!

Thanks, Eddie!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk