All true. Hell, six months ago on here people were saying you can’t inject subq.
A few for sure. Even now I'd say why bother? I'll cite what I've previously mentioned:
The various historical identification and isolation of Testosterone is in excess of 100 years old (late 1800's onwards). Heck the 'essence' concept (viz eating meat and bulls testicles etc) is ancient history. Fast forward to the (I've covered this properly) 1940's and forms of test were available then. Go forward another 10-20 years and you have what we recognize as AAS.
The mixed batch of big pharma companies who produced differing forms of AAS is extensive. In modern terms they spent 10's of millions if not 100's of millions of dollars between them creating and testing those products. This includes, as covered before, the doses per ml. Hence why I am no fan of 350-500mg per ml products. In almost, if not every, case said products will sting more and crash more. Labs produce them cos some use want them. Not because they are more effective. If they was a pharma producer would have done this (and just upped their prices). But when used medically patients had issues.
The same applies to sub-q application vs IM. The side issue is, of course, PED use vs medical. But I take it as a given that various models of application were trialed and tested. By way of example some years ago some drugs were, in effect, blown under air pressure through the skin. Equally we've seen birth control and HRT done with (much like cattle) done via pellets inserted under the skin.
Now I'll admit a bias - I don't like pinning as such. Ergo the idea of needing to pin more frequently and, worse, at PED doses sub-q... fuck that. It'd mean (for me when on cycle) approx 4 pins per day I'd inject (sus/deca c2ml x 2 days a week). Way more for those that do over a gram a week, use shorter esters and so on.
It's kinda ok for low to medium dose TRT. I'd still go with 1 jab a fortnight vs 1-2 per day x 1-2 days per week.
Now GP's grand idea is just that - a shorter ester. So more pinning.
Then we get into the whole idea for many of Sub-q - the 'theory' of a level testosterone level. Ask them why? If they 'feel' the actual high and low test levels I'd look at the ester of choice. Most people (I'd argue the majority hence the advice) do not really have highs and lows kinda days on test. I certainly don't. It MIGHT be an issue of body condition, them being 'low t' kind of fellas normally (off cycle), outside stress and life issues or simply as need for TRT vs PED (key part being performance).
I've explained in detail why a perfectly flat line level isn't really beneficial. And almost impossible to make happen.
Almost none of this applies to GP (proven to him in his own words following the tests he tried to cheat). It's, to date, ALL purely theory. He's not even using estrogen controllers and or test boosters - yet