Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
like mobster brung up. dave palumbo sells a kit and it isn't expensive at all.
like mobster brung up. dave palumbo sells a kit and it isn't expensive at all.
Yes, DYI test kits "won't tell you if the product is properly dosed or not," which is a fact that renders them all but completely useless.
So what is the real reason for not wanting to create a paid-members-only-forum devoted to the posting of professionally administered test results? Might there be a concern for the fact that certain non-approved sources would be shown to be just as good if not better than approved sources, thereby stepping on the toes of those approved sources?
The only way is having guys use the products and get bloods. Tadeas has posted bloods on RM gear countless times.
In the end these tests would mean nothing just like reviews. Any lab can have a bad batch here and there. It will never be the same.
Take Robolics for example........there are guys that love his gear.......and others that had hair in their vials.
And anyone is free to go start their own forum with their own source rules!!!!!!!
In the end these tests would mean nothing just like reviews. Any lab can have a bad batch here and there. It will never be the same.
Take Robolics for example........there are guys that love his gear.......and others that had hair in their vials.
And anyone is free to go start their own forum with their own source rules!!!!!!!
stimy
New member
In the end, that would be the only way to do this Eddie. It won't be supported here. It would have to be something without any paid vendors that would question their sponsorship if their was competition.
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
And there lies the problem. Unless you started one and wanted to financially support it yourself, you would need sponsors. And back to square 1.
What you wrote here, stimy, is absolutely true. Yes, such a forum would indeed have to be a forum devoid of commercial sponsors due to the undeniable fact that commercial sponsors always dictate certain content; serving their interests while simultaneously compromising the interests of participants. Commercial sponsors will, for instance, denigrate their competitors irrespective of whether or not those competitors are deserving of denigration. For private profit always takes precedence over human need.
Well said, stimy. Well said.
But, Masonic, I'm not talking about the development of a website that would be sustained by he or those who would create it. Rather, I have proposed the creation of a website that would be sustained by its paid members who would then have access to the testing results that they would pay for.
I sincerely apologize should I have not already made that point clear.
Any response, Masonic?
Interesting idea but I don't see it ever happening. People don't want to pay for anything. Subscription websites don't work. That''s why ever bodybuilding forum on the internet is free and the sites rely on sponsors to pay the hosting fees, website costs etc.
In a nut shell
lots of guys have started their own fitness sites with this concept but it ends up being a clusterfuck.
bostin loyd has his own forum which is paid subscription. but why pay when you can get everything free here? we have free videos, articles and podcasts you can gain tons of knowledge
bostin loyd has his own forum which is paid subscription. but why pay when you can get everything free here? we have free videos, articles and podcasts you can gain tons of knowledge
Last edited:
I think that idea is sound but will it work in the real world? What good would it be if there were only 10 members.
Well, if, for example, the noncommercial listener-sponsored Pacifica Radio network - pacifica.org - which has been around since 1949 and which paved the way for PBS and NPR serves as any indication, yes, I think that it would work in the real world simply because it would offer a very valuable and cost-effective service for its potential members. Think about it. Many of us spend thousands of dollars each year on AS, AAS, and ASS, without ever knowing for certain that what we are purchasing is in fact both bona fide and properly dosed.* So would it not behoove us to be certain of the legitimacy and dosing of what we are purchasing prior to our purchasing it, and all for the very reasonable price of, say, $100 per year? (For the record, I for one would be perfectly willing to pay as much as $150 per year for such a service.)
Come on, ladies and gentlemen who have yet to weigh in on this, does this not sound like a good idea to you?
* "ASS" was my attempt at humor.
Though many of us do in fact spend thousands of dollars each year towards the pursuit of ASS.abominable swoleman
New member
i know riodmass is big on evo never used it but i plan too in the future just too see. so i cant speak on that. naps however im not a huge fan i recieved some 100 percent underdosed test a year or 2 ago and moved on from naps. currently me and 3 friends are using ppl and i can tell you the test e test p npp tbol winny and adex are all g2g im not sure on other compunds as ive not used them yet.
I've never used naps so I can't comment but most of the reviews I have read on naps are mixed, at best.
Roid Mass has pretty much 100% positive reviews. The only thing people complain about with roid mass is the high price. But it's like anything in life...you get what you pay for
The way you guys talk about this idea being a no-brainer, why don't you just start it up and give it a go?
Meaning, what, Stevesmi, that you purchased any number of vials with the brand name "Naps" printed on their labels, and the lot of them were under-dosed?
