Sarms

[FL3X_BLU]

I'm new to the forums and just want to see some opinions on SARMS. Why would people not just take legit gear. Is it worth shutting your test level off and having less results. So basically I'm asking if sarms are even worth it instead of gear because I know they are not as strong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[muskate]

In terms of building muscle mass and size, SARMS aren't the strength of steroids but they are extremely minimal in the way of side effects. SARMS are only minimally suppressive of natural testosterone production so all that is needed as a mini PCT after a cycle of SARMS is a good natural testosterone booster like HCGenerate ES from n2bm.com. We are talking like 5% suppression from SARMS vs close to 100% from steroids.

SARMS are completely anabolic substances so there is no risk of hair loss or developing emasculating side effects in females. They also don't effect cholesterol levels, blood pressure, or effect your liver in any way.

There really isn't anything better then SARMS for increasing fat loss and endurance. Certain SARMS like cardarine directly increase fat loss and endurance.

You basically get all the good of steroids with SARMS, but with much less side effects. Granted, they aren't as strong as steroids but they are almost side effect free.

Here ia good video for you to watch. I explain all the different SARMS available in depth and talk about sample SARM cycle lay outs: http://www.evolutionary.org/forums/anabolic-steroids-peds/new-video-sarms-explained-46877.html

A very common SARMS cycle is the SARMS triple stack. The triple stack is combination of S4 + ostarine + cardarine. http://www.evolutionary.org/the-SARMS-triple-stack-protocol
Cardarine is a great SARM for fat loss and endurance
Ostarine is a great SARM for recovery
S4 is a great SARM for strength gains
You get the best of everything by stacking the three together.

 

[FL3X_BLU]

Great response . Much respect


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[LevButlerov]

First of all, I would not use prohormones, since it is completely pointless these days. Back in the days prohormones had one advantage, and only one - they were legal to buy and use. However, they cause the same side effects as steroids do, and they are even more liver toxic. Yet, the results they provide are not as prominent as those you can get with steroids. Therefore, if you are ready to take on those side effects, it makes much more sense to go with steroids, which will give more results. If you want something legal to use, and safer in terms of side effects, SARMS are a much better alternative - they are legal to buy and use, and they will barely cause any side effects at all. They may not be as potent as steroids are, but this is the price you pay for not having to deal with so many side effects.

Therefore, it is best to choose betwee steroids, with prominent results and considerable side effects, or SARMS, with milder effects, but no undesired effects.

 

[Jay Scott]

I'm new to the forums and just want to see some opinions on SARMS. Why would people not just take legit gear. Is it worth shutting your test level off and having less results. So basically I'm asking if sarms are even worth it instead of gear because I know they are not as strong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think people dont want to run steroids and choose sarms due to 2 reasons:
1. they dont want to pin
2. they dont want to be shutdown

Personally I think sarms can be incorporated in steroid cycles in a very effective way which a lot of people do not realise

 

[stevesmi]

I'm new to the forums and just want to see some opinions on SARMS. Why would people not just take legit gear. Is it worth shutting your test level off and having less results. So basically I'm asking if sarms are even worth it instead of gear because I know they are not as strong.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

there are many reasons to use SARM's over AAS

1. sarm's are pure anabolics. this means they are safe for females and in males will not enlarge your prostate or cause other androgenic sides like heart strain and aggression

2. sarm's do not aromatize or metabolize into things in the body. many AAS turn into DHN, DHT, and estrogen, and prolactin in the body. sarm's does not. this means you can stack them with AAS without adding side effects.

3. sarm's are less suppressive than AAS. this means you can use them in a bridge or in some cases even in pct.

4. sarm's don't require pinning

5. sarm's wont fuck up your organs

6. in certain situations sarm's are better. example was if you are injured, sarm's can help heal injuries. AAS will make injuries worse. if you are overweight or underweight sarm's are safer to use.

the versatility of sarm's makes them a must use. an example is you can run an AAS cycle then use sarm's in pct and bridge to hold onto gains. they also are great to use if you take lets say a year off of gear because of injuries or other problems.

 

[Masonic Bodybuilder]

Wow, Steve made a comprehensive list above! I think it really comes down to the individual and their goals. They both definitely have a place in the bodybuilding world. You just have to look at the pros and cons of both and make your decision.