Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
Im currently planning my next cycle. I think i'll be running test c/deca at 1000/600 a week and dbol at 50mg for the first 4 weeks. Ive done mostly test only cycles in the past and never ran an AI on cycle. Whats the better choice for this cycle? I'll be doing the normal clomid/nolva pct. I've never had any issues with gyno in the past but I want to be careful since I'm upping the dosage.
Gruntwerkz
New member
Holy fuck may as well get some letro then, aromasin will be costly to run for that cycle man you’ll need a high dose.
Gram of test plus dbol and a sufficient dose of deca which still aromatizes a bit.
If it were me I’d use adex versus aromasin for this.
Satan62
Active member
Aromasin hands down. There is no comparison between those two.
Why so much test'?
And are you planning to use cabergoline?
- - - Updated - - -
Quite true.
Gruntwerkz
New member
Aromasin is the best choice being a steroidal suicide inhibitor but given the amount of aromatizable gear I would personally use letro as it’s the strongest. Arimidex would be my best choice for that much gear because MG per MG it’s much stronger then aromasin, on 500mg a week of test I can run .5mg EOD of arimidex and have an e2 in the 30s where as aromasin I’d need 12.5mg EOD or more for the same numbers.
I prefer aromasin as it’s the best hands down but in terms of cost efficiency and practicality letro or arimidex seem better suited for retarded amounts of gear.
He’d need probably 25mg ED well he’s on the dbol too, that’s a hell of an AI bill.
Satan62
Active member
Depends on how he reacts to test. I would start at 25mg/eod. I prefer aromasin since it is a suicidal inhibitor. I don't find it that much more expensive when you consider what it does. It's just a better choice all around.
Gruntwerkz
New member
I must just be e2 sensitive because it seemed to be back when I did run high amounts of gear that aromasin just didn’t cut it on blood work, I always went to letro or arimidex. Must just be how I responded then.
I believe the cost or aromasin is much justified when you’re running moderate or low amounts of gear, seeing as aromasin helps raise IGF1 even more, raises free T (more then other AIs), and is less destructive to your lipid profile.
However is does cost a fair share more from some sources, some are the same but the majority of them it’s higher. Letro being the strongest hands down is the cheapest and easiest bet if you’re running that much shit. So point is this is why, the extra benefits you get from aromasin aren’t going to matter on 1.6 grams of gear plus a harsh oral, your lipids are shot anyway, the small boost in IGF well that’s not gonna matter with that much gear, the only benefit that sticks is it’s suicidal.
Just my opinion though, I feel aromasin is much more appropriate for low dose cycles where the benefits are notable, however if money doesn’t matter to you or personal preference is aromasin then by all means.
I believe also of note anyone running that much gear needs letro on hand regardless Incase there’s a gyno emergency.
Satan62
Active member
I always have a good supply of aromasin on hand and I rarely use letro. Not that there is anything wrong with letro. If it works for you, go with it!
PGanabolics
New Member
I am a fan of Aromasin myself. From the studies that I have seen, it has the lowest amount of negative impact on cholesterol levels.
Satan62
Active member
Yes, it is the preferred choice.
Gruntwerkz
New member
It does but with that said is that a notable difference when your running a couple grams of gear?
aromasin would be the choice but why on earth do you feel the need to run such ridiculously high doses.. .i just dont get what im seeing lately with all these crazy doses.. its COMPLETELY UNNECESSARY... im starting to think people just enjoy getting sides...
Similar threads
