A little surprised I keep seeing people say T doesn't burn fat when virtually every study shows it is highly effective at fat reduction, specifically around the abdominal area.
One study in particular took a group of men who all had T levels around the median range of 600 and half were given something that reduced their levels to 300. At the end of the study that group had a 36% increase in fat compared to the normal group.
Another study showed that even giving a non anabolic 100 mg a week dose of testosterone to men for 8 weeks caused a drop of 6% bodyfat compared to control group of men with similar starting T levels that didn't get the 100 mg dose weekly.
Another study compared results of giving four different dosages of testosterone weekly to men for 20 weeks, one was a low dose, one a TRT dose, 300mg and 600mg. At the end of the study the more testosterone they had gotten the more muscle they gained and the more fat they lost.
Other studies have repeatedly shown a high correlation between men with the highest testosterone:estrogen ratio having the least amount of abdominal fat.
So I am not understanding why its continually stated that Testosterone doesn't help with fat reduction when basically every study done, especially at high levels shows it has a significant effect, especially in the abdominal region...
Any thoughts regarding this? Am I missing something here? I've even read articles saying that testosterone is more important to fat loss than GH since they have a synergistic effect and high T levels can stimulate the release of GH by itself via mechanisms in the body...
And yes I realize that gaining muscle will reduce BF% but that still doesn't explain the significant reduction in abdominal skinfold measurements. If there was no effect then a person losing BF because of muscle gain would still have the same abdominal skinfold measurement, they would just have more LBM to lower the percentage of fat...
One study in particular took a group of men who all had T levels around the median range of 600 and half were given something that reduced their levels to 300. At the end of the study that group had a 36% increase in fat compared to the normal group.
Another study showed that even giving a non anabolic 100 mg a week dose of testosterone to men for 8 weeks caused a drop of 6% bodyfat compared to control group of men with similar starting T levels that didn't get the 100 mg dose weekly.
Another study compared results of giving four different dosages of testosterone weekly to men for 20 weeks, one was a low dose, one a TRT dose, 300mg and 600mg. At the end of the study the more testosterone they had gotten the more muscle they gained and the more fat they lost.
Other studies have repeatedly shown a high correlation between men with the highest testosterone:estrogen ratio having the least amount of abdominal fat.
So I am not understanding why its continually stated that Testosterone doesn't help with fat reduction when basically every study done, especially at high levels shows it has a significant effect, especially in the abdominal region...
Any thoughts regarding this? Am I missing something here? I've even read articles saying that testosterone is more important to fat loss than GH since they have a synergistic effect and high T levels can stimulate the release of GH by itself via mechanisms in the body...
And yes I realize that gaining muscle will reduce BF% but that still doesn't explain the significant reduction in abdominal skinfold measurements. If there was no effect then a person losing BF because of muscle gain would still have the same abdominal skinfold measurement, they would just have more LBM to lower the percentage of fat...
Last edited:
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 












