Why only 10mL vials from sources?

[s-tren-gth]

Wouldn't a single 250mL vial be less likely to get seized than 25 10ml vials?

I guess they use 10ml ones because most customers are dubious about new sources therefore won't lose as much if the 250 ml one turns fake, underdosed or a plain scam.

 

[prime863]

that and basic business, wouldn't be feasible for labs to cook up in only 250ml vials
and no one orders 25 vials of the same compound generally
plus the cost would be ridiculous and wouldn't allow for Variety

 

[Bad Juju]

yeah man. thats a silly question. It has nothing to do with trusting sources. Why would any lab do 250ml vials? Could you imaging having to buy that much tren in one go? Or primo? Who could afford that? Just cause the vials bigger doesn't necessarily mean you're going to get any type of deal really. 10ml vials allow for lower costs and more available variety of products due to lower costs. And honestly bigger items would get searched more. Smaller vials are less conspicuous imo.

 

[s-tren-gth]

I admit the 250 ml example was too exaggerated.
But wouldn't a 100 ml be more likely to get thru customs than 10 10 ml vials?

 

[stevesmi]

I admit the 250 ml example was too exaggerated.
But wouldn't a 100 ml be more likely to get thru customs than 10 10 ml vials?

100ML would cost 10X the price of a 10ML

doesn't make sense for the consumer... would be like spending $400 on gas instead of the normal $40 to fill up.. nobody wants to blow their wad upfront... plus you want variety.. 10ML vial of one thing and 10ML of another etc. some UGL's do make 20ML in test cause its dirt cheap.

 

[the rock]

I agree ,I found a great bad ass source that does 20 ml vials with great prices and the stuff is nuclear and local ..

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

 

[BigBro]

100ML would cost 10X the price of a 10ML

Um, yes but then you are getting 10x the product. In fact, in theory it would be cheaper as there is only one vial which only needs to be filled once. Way less container costs and time filling and capping.

Considering the amount of test that some use, it would be logical to access it in 100ml vials. At about 1g per week, thats a years supply.

I don't know of anyone that just buys one 10ml vial of common roids (test & tren) so even 20ml vials would be more sensible.

- - - Updated - - -

Speaking of which, was there not a product that was sold in bladders a few years back?

 

[Bad Juju]

these days if you get a 100ml vial you'll be paying 10x the cost. We charge not just on the costs of the product itself but also all the overhead and risk that goes with it. So yes, theoretically you should get a better deal. Realistically you won't. Usually we do a discount if orders are high enough but its pointless for any lab to be making/selling anything over 20ml

 

[stevesmi]

Um, yes but then you are getting 10x the product. In fact, in theory it would be cheaper as there is only one vial which only needs to be filled once. Way less container costs and time filling and capping.

Considering the amount of test that some use, it would be logical to access it in 100ml vials. At about 1g per week, thats a years supply.

I don't know of anyone that just buys one 10ml vial of common roids (test & tren) so even 20ml vials would be more sensible.

- - - Updated - - -

Speaking of which, was there not a product that was sold in bladders a few years back?

yeah but like I said.. who buys $400 worth of gas each time? nobody? we pay as we go.. or pay your entire water bill for the year upfront.. or pay your entire rent for the year upfront? hell no! even if you saved 10% on your end bill nobody wants to pay upfront.. keep your money and don't have huge vials of gear laying around.. its safer and more economical

 

[Portfolio]

Generally speaking, I order twenty to thirty 10ml vials of Test each time that I order Test for the mere fact that Test is a base and thus heavily used substance, and because I receive a substantial discount.

So let us suppose that two or three of those vials break while in transit, thereby necessitating that my supplier replace those two or three vials, which my supplier will do - no big deal. But if my supplier were to mail one 200ml bottle or one 300ml bottle, not only would I likely become the target of a controlled delivery in the event that that one gigantic vial were to break (imagine the mess), so too would my supplier lose far more money relative to their having to replace my gear.

Ergo, if it made sense to produce 200ml and 300ml vials of juice, then labs would do that. But that wouldn't make sense. So labs don't do that. Simple.

 

[AnDrovis]

Generally speaking, I order twenty to thirty 10ml vials of Test each time that I order Test for the mere fact that Test is a base and thus heavily used substance, and because I receive a substantial discount.

So let us suppose that two or three of those vials break while in transit, thereby necessitating that my supplier replace those two or three vials, which my supplier will do - no big deal. But if my supplier were to mail one 200ml bottle or one 300ml bottle, not only would I likely become the target of a controlled delivery in the event that that one gigantic vial were to break (imagine the mess), so too would my supplier lose far more money relative to their having to replace my gear.

Ergo, if it made sense to produce 200ml and 300ml vials of juice, then labs would do that. But that wouldn't make sense. So labs don't do that. Simple.

This is one of the most practical reasons a lab wouldn't package and ship such large vials.

 

[littlecody1984]

I had a source that did 100ml vials all day long. AGL was the name, but I can't get ahold of him any more. I got 100ml of 100mg tren ace for like $650. Well worth the cost if you figure 10 regular 10ml bottles at $75 or $80 each. About to finish it off this week. I got three cycles out of it pinning 100mg eod. So I wish everyone did it. It would be a cheaper route. It's called economy of scales. The more you produce the cheaper it is to produce. It's a common business theory that applies to any legal or illegal business.

 

[Juced_porkchop]

Wouldn't a single 250mL vial be less likely to get seized than 25 10ml vials?

I guess they use 10ml ones because most customers are dubious about new sources therefore won't lose as much if the 250 ml one turns fake, underdosed or a plain scam.

drawing that many times from a big bottle like that will have your stopper looking like swiss cheese and be a risk to sterility. . i would not buy anything more than 20ml btl IMO

 

[Nordic F]

Generally speaking, I order twenty to thirty 10ml vials of Test each time that I order Test for the mere fact that Test is a base and thus heavily used substance, and because I receive a substantial discount.

So let us suppose that two or three of those vials break while in transit, thereby necessitating that my supplier replace those two or three vials, which my supplier will do - no big deal. But if my supplier were to mail one 200ml bottle or one 300ml bottle, not only would I likely become the target of a controlled delivery in the event that that one gigantic vial were to break (imagine the mess), so too would my supplier lose far more money relative to their having to replace my gear.

Ergo, if it made sense to produce 200ml and 300ml vials of juice, then labs would do that. But that wouldn't make sense. So labs don't do that. Simple.

This right here is the most valid point on this thread.

 

[Mark.Callous]

I'd like to see 20ml, maybe even 40ml, vials available, but it's just not a big deal to me. 10ml does seem small, especially if you're going above and beyond trt doses. But that's pretty much the universal method for packaging this stuff. So, I pretty much just accept that they have their reasons. And, really, it's what's inside that counts. If it's fire, I'll settle for those little single dose 1 amp bastards if that's what's being offered.

 

[blowingup72]

I'd like to see 20ml, maybe even 40ml, vials available, but it's just not a big deal to me. 10ml does seem small, especially if you're going above and beyond trt doses. But that's pretty much the universal method for packaging this stuff. So, I pretty much just accept that they have their reasons. And, really, it's what's inside that counts. If it's fire, I'll settle for those little single dose 1 amp bastards if that's what's being offered.

To expand on you quality comment...10ml is fine for most men's purposes in my opinion. I think.people have a tendency to use way more drugs then are necessary without looking at other factors first. If you have a good source your would be surprised how little juice you can get away with using. Too many guys just pick a number out of someone else's cycle and never experiment with bringing things down , increasing training loads or tightening up the diet . its just more, more more drugs and that's not the answer for what most guys are looking to achieve.

 

[Nordic F]

Im going to add to the above comment. Simple is best. Ive ran massive cycles with great gains and still my favorite ones that I always go back to are a simple 500mg enth and an oral cycle. I still get great gains from it. quantity isn't always needed

 

[blowingup72]

Im going to add to the above comment. Simple is best. Ive ran massive cycles with great gains and still my favorite ones that I always go back to are a simple 500mg enth and an oral cycle. I still get great gains from it. quantity isn't always needed

100% agree

I've brought things way down. Test E only 375 a week. Tren E 400 a week and thats it. Strength is still way up, endurance is actually better. Feel better. Gyno going away. Cant go wrong.

 

[ghrbrah]

ARL russia and Gauls both do this very successfully


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[OceanusLabs]

I once did a 500ml order for a customer, because he wanted a discount. It is far less time consuming for me to make a single 500ml batch than 50 vials. He and his friend were on Test for life, so it was cheaper and easier for them too. But most (90%) of people run 2 - 3 x 10ml vials per compound per cycle, so there is no need to make 50ml or higher