Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIESUGL OZUGFREAKOxygenPharm

Source Review Board Suggestion

R

rebellifter

Banned
Is it possible to prohibit members from reviewing sources until they reach 100 posts? Sooooo many posters driving up the reviews for some have only 2 or 3 posts and join right when they post.

Slows down the research for posters who actually care.
 
rebellifter said:
Is it possible to prohibit members from reviewing sources until they reach 100 posts? Sooooo many posters driving up the reviews for some have only 2 or 3 posts and join right when they post.

Slows down the research for posters who actually care.
Click to expand...

I've brought this up before.. I think it's a great idea.. I'll send it up again...
 
I agree with this as well. If your not a known member we don't give a shit about your review.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk
 
Great point! This should be a requirement for sure.

It'd weed out the BS reviews and make the good labs shine in return, having reviews from guys with a decent rep
 
Yeah, that would work well if they could read but not post. To me it seems like some of those reviews only have 2 or so posts.
 
Glad you all like the idea. How do we get this done? Is it easier for the mods to just delete all review posts that aren't from someone with 100 posts?
 
rebellifter said:
Glad you all like the idea. How do we get this done? Is it easier for the mods to just delete all review posts that aren't from someone with 100 posts?
Click to expand...

Well look into it bud.. There's allot things involved.. But good idea
 
We need this bad. I saw on source with 7 reviews from people with 1 or 0 post. Thats bullshit.
 
I actually brought this Very Topic up a couple weeks ago when I was talking with WPA.
There are changes in the works, just don't want to change too many things at once.............................. JP
P.S.
That Source Review has been a "Pet-Peeve" of mine for quite a while.
 
rebellifter said:
Is it possible to prohibit members from reviewing sources until they reach 100 posts? Sooooo many posters driving up the reviews for some have only 2 or 3 posts and join right when they post.

Slows down the research for posters who actually care.
Click to expand...

Not only that, but can you change the rules such that one cannot post a review unless they've actually USED the product? About 80% of the "reviews" there go something like this "I sent them money and I got my gear, haven't used it, but will keep you posted"! What the f*ck is that a review of? OK, someone sent off money and got some oil in return, good for them. I know everyone likes to dig at eRoids, but at least they get pissy if you try to post a review without actually using the gear.
 
TreyG said:
We need this bad. I saw on source with 7 reviews from people with 1 or 0 post. Thats bullshit.
Click to expand...

we are looking into this. It is an idea we liked and we understand the concept.

But just because a source has a review by a member 0 or 1 post , it doesnt mean it is fake, i think that is a huge misconception here.Sources do ask their customers to come over here and post reviews..they also ask non board members to spike their reviews and then the customers sometimes choose not to stay here, some dont even like any forums, some people are not forum junkies like us but do have experiences to post.This was encouraged at one time by us but we are not sure anymore, if people dont stay maybe their review isnt worth being here, plus some places could make fake reviews under current system. .i deal with sources and see the emails they send out to customers and i also see places with their own website asking customers to come over to evo and post their reviews. i i guarantee you they are not all fake but there is a good chance some are indeed and some places that suck are doing this to post a false image
 
rebellifter said:
Glad you all like the idea. How do we get this done? Is it easier for the mods to just delete all review posts that aren't from someone with 100 posts?
Click to expand...

i not sure we are going to do that.at one time we encourage labs to have their customers come over here and post reviews.. even guys we knew wouldnt stay.Just to have as much feedback as we could get for you guys for labs.Wouldnt be right to take that away from them, lot of work put into getting their reviews high.No question some abused it in my personal opinion but im not sure its right to punish good labs that worked very hard to get their reviews over here .There are some labs with over 50 good reviews that no question in my mind are all legit.Comes down to again, If the whole bunch should be punished for a few bad apples . I guess this is what we will have to decide.

First thing i would like to see is know scamming labs in there with good reviews taken down.
 
Last edited:
I have to Agree 100% with Hurricane.
This is not a Black and White Situation, if it was, it would be easier to deal with........................ JP
 
Thanks for clarifying - I think we are just looking for the best possible way to "do our research" into finding legit sources. I for one have needed to find 3 sources to get all the products I needed and it would have been easier had their not been such BS on some of the reviews.
 
rebellifter said:
Thanks for clarifying - I think we are just looking for the best possible way to "do our research" into finding legit sources. I for one have needed to find 3 sources to get all the products I needed and it would have been easier had their not been such BS on some of the reviews.
Click to expand...

ill say it again. just because someone doesnt have 50 or 100 posts. doesnt mean their review isnt real. sources send people who use them to give their honest reviews, they have it listed in their sale emails and websites to come here and post reviews because more reviews = more sales.. which any decent source would do,if they got legit gear.Every place with over 25 good reviews is a good place or was at one time, why they got their imo .if you only want peoples opinion on the sources that use this board frequently then thats a different subject.but thats not how it was intended to be, when it was started
 
What about allowing the people with low posts to keep posting, but make it so that when you click on the source it's sorted numerically from most posts to fewest? That way you won't see those reviews by the guys with low posts unless you scroll thru all the others.
 
Bighauss26 said:
As long as we don't evolve into meso.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Jesus that will never happen.. Hence why we're improving... Cheers
 
JoshBlaze said:
What about allowing the people with low posts to keep posting, but make it so that when you click on the source it's sorted numerically from most posts to fewest? That way you won't see those reviews by the guys with low posts unless you scroll thru all the others.
Click to expand...

That's not a bad idea but some people want to see how good a source is as of now vs when the guy with a 1000 post wrote a review
 
rebellifter said:
Is it possible to prohibit members from reviewing sources until they reach 100 posts? Sooooo many posters driving up the reviews for some have only 2 or 3 posts and join right when they post.

Slows down the research for posters who actually care.
Click to expand...

excellent suggestion bro! truly hope this happens
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Airborne1097
Approved Log Test HGH Cycle Body Recomp Log
Replies
89
Views
616
LevButlerov
LevButlerov
H
Can we talk about this?
Replies
18
Views
528
LevButlerov
LevButlerov
Noah Wixx
Approved US-PHARMACIES TD/Review
Replies
62
Views
2K
HarleyGuy
HarleyGuy
P
Suspended ENHANCED Labs - Vendor Intro
Replies
48
Views
2K
Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
eazy_
Chronic AAS abuse is increasingly recognized to have neurodegenerative potential.
Replies
1
Views
61
HarleyGuy
HarleyGuy
Back
Top Bottom