Blood Test Results - Robolics Test C!

[RunLiftFight]

just relax... personally, i don't think your intentions were bad in any way... the one thing you did do wrong is you didn't do proper procedure with bloodwork etc... but i do not believe you are the one with a motive... i think you are just new to all of this and that's fine... just pm robo as advised and i am sure they will get you taken care of... ii tend to stay out of these type of threads but the absurdity (not you) posted in here brought me over and i felt it necessary to get the record straight here... just pm him and all will be fine man...

Thanks again as always Dylan. I was just afraid of my rep being ruined on these forums because I learned all about gear from your youtube videos and this very forum. I've always enjoyed being a member here just one post of mine nearly got me exiled and labeled as a fuckin troll business basher.

 

[-SD-]

^ This

Thank you SD.
THis thread went so dark and I was fucking being attacked with accusations. All I did was post my results to show you were legit, I didn't know people would be like "yo that's low yo that's low". Read my OP word for word

Ugh that sucked ass.

And btw SD it was a powder supplier problem I WILL STILL do business with you because I know you are gtg and I am fuckin sorry that this thread went like this.

Dont worry about it a lot of guys got fucked by that supplier, me included.

 

[EER]

^ This

Thank you SD.
THis thread went so dark and I was fucking being attacked with accusations. All I did was post my results to show you were legit, I didn't know people would be like "yo that's low yo that's low". Read my OP word for word

Ugh that sucked ass.

And btw SD it was a powder supplier problem I WILL STILL do business with you because I know you are gtg and I am fuckin sorry that this thread went like this.

It reminded me of the Parable Daniel in the Lions' Den

 

[Bigguy35]

Geez , I knew this was going to get ugly quick . I think the op was respectful to everyone and very polite . No need to hate on him . Then it turns out he might be right .... Some of you are a bit much on here . Even coca- cola has made a bad batch . Anything is possible and that doesn't make robo a bad ugl and it doesn't make the op a liar with a motive . Everybody take your a.I. Now, eod is up now .

 

[Casca]

Damn where the hell was everbody when, someone questioned the ugl's as being underdosed not to long ago? Didn't hear a peep before.


THE GREEN MACHINE

CASCA

 

[swampmule]

I think a couple people in this thread are either on tren or are having some serious estrogen rebound... I mean look at what happened, y'all all got worked up over nothing.

And bigguy hit it right on the money. Idc how great someone is at something, somewhere along the way there will be a fuck up with something, especially from outside sources like what happened here.

 

[snackmachine]

Is that trough or peak? Actually, now that I think about it... not sure if you're just trolling here, haha

No troll here - and I have always supported -SD-. My last trt blood exam, did 100mg Watson test c shot, drew blood 6 days later, I was at 850. I was coming off a test p blast two weeks prior, but that should of timed out because of the short ester.

I was not insinuating Robo was not legit. But that is a low value for that much test. And, as SD said, it was a bad batch.

 

[insertnamehere]

No troll here - and I have always supported -SD-. My last trt blood exam, did 100mg Watson test c shot, drew blood 6 days later, I was at 850. I was coming off a test p blast two weeks prior, but that should of timed out because of the short ester.

I was not insinuating Robo was not legit. But that is a low value for that much test. And, as SD said, it was a bad batch.

I didn't think you were saying anything bad about Robo but I wasn't sure if you were referring to 2k+ being nadir on your 100mg a week dose. I understand now, thanks.

 

[Tuskill]

Ok I just got back my blood test. I have been on 1204mg of Rx Watson Test-C every 4 weeks. I take 86mg EOD. I was going to cut my dosage down to 200mg a week, but for the next two weeks I’m going to take 85mg EOD of Robo Test-C and get a new blood test. I will only be changing my AI.. Right now I’m taking Anastrozole and will be changing to Exemestane, because the arimidex is not working as you can see”E2=81.6”
I have made only one order from Robo, and it was a great transaction. I have never received any freebie’s from robo nor have I talk to him about this test. I have no reason to believe robo gear is not gtg, but this seems like a good opportunity for me to see for myself.

 

[ceo]

Hate to be the bringer of all news that is bad... but 200mg of legitimate test 85+ purity would elevate you to 1800-2000 range. Your numbers are extremely low and you definitely didn't/aren't getting anywhere near what you should out of your cycle. Sorry.

been trying to tell these sources to get their shit Mass spec tested.... eh, maybe enough of these and they'll finally listen.

Boy the Pfizer, Watson, Sandoz, and paddock I've been using all these years must be shit then. 200mg of that puts me between 800-1200.

Do you think I can get all my money back? Those under dosing, scamming ass BigPharma fucks.

 

[birches]

Brother this speaks volumes about you. You could have easily feed the OP to the wolves but instead you stood on good principles...well done sir...well done!!!!

lol had it been Dio and not robo, we would have had to make some popcorn.

 

[ceo]

I get that on a trt dose of 100mg/wk

If that were true no doctor would prescribe 100mg because that is WAY over any labs range.

 

[Felicity]

Boy the Pfizer, Watson, Sandoz, and paddock I've been using all these years must be shit then. 200mg of that puts me between 800-1200.

Do you think I can get all my money back? Those under dosing, scamming ass BigPharma fucks.

if 200mg of Watson Test puts you at (only) 800, assuming we're using the weekly injections and not 10 days like TRT, I would suggest you do in fact call them as you probably have some shitty pharma, bud

 

[jerseydevil]

if 200mg of Watson Test puts you at (only) 800, assuming we're using the weekly injections and not 10 days like TRT, I would suggest you do in fact call them as you probably have some shitty pharma, bud

Sorry but this is bullshit.... Does no one read my posts?

http://www.evolutionary.org/forums/...ics-test-c!-9859-4.html?viewfull=1#post194623

 

[Mattdogg]

Looks like doctors should use a 25mg/week TRT prescription. lol

 

[Rockwilder]

Looks like doctors should use a 25mg/week TRT prescription. lol

I was gonna say, isn't the goal of TRT to put you at the high end of the 300-1100 ng/dl scale...not, ya know, DOUBLE it lol...

 

[Felicity]

Sorry but this is bullshit.... Does no one read my posts?

http://www.evolutionary.org/forums/...ics-test-c!-9859-4.html?viewfull=1#post194623

Great, 1 study - thanks for that. It/I did not specify the endless variables.
-Were dosages split?
-How does the individual metabolize testosterone?
-What is someones natural testosterone production, just because they begin TRT, there body is not fully "shut down" for a long time. IN your study, they were given an agonist to wipe their production.
-The study at 5 people, to understand their physiological and diversify would be the only thing to get reliable information.
-What did the agonist do and what effects did it affect the newly introduced testosterone, they tell you nothing about it.

Standard TRT protocol and prescribing is 100mg every week or 200mg EOW. Pfizer recommends a dosage of 50-200mg every 2-4 weeks. I have seen far too many bloodwork examples to concur with 1 single study. Given my first hand experience I would bet any sum of money the testosterone in question is <60% purity whereas I've never seen Watson below 86%. To believe 400mg of Testosterone made by watson could keep you as low as 1600 (per my comment above you disagreed with in saying 200mg could actually only raise you to 800) would assume these people running 500mg/week are hardly breaking 1000 on the test levels which is hardly out of the "Natural range." You might get 1/10 UGL's that have >75 purity test, again first hand experience, so with that being said, people running 500mg/week on first cycles have about a 1/10 chance of getting out of the 300-1000 (roughly) nd/gl range.

 

[Tuskill]

300mg a week of Watson is getting me over 1500nd/gl TT and over 49 FT. I didn't know the testing lab I used puts a cap on the testing... I will try and use a different lab for my test on the Robo that dose not cap.

 

[Felicity]

Great, 1 study - thanks for that. It/I did not specify the endless variables.
-Were dosages split?
-How does the individual metabolize testosterone?
-What is someones natural testosterone production, just because they begin TRT, there body is not fully "shut down" for a long time. IN your study, they were given an agonist to wipe their production.
-The study at 5 people, to understand their physiological and diversify would be the only thing to get reliable information.
-What did the agonist do and what effects did it affect the newly introduced testosterone, they tell you nothing about it.

Standard TRT protocol and prescribing is 100mg every week or 200mg EOW. Pfizer recommends a dosage of 50-200mg every 2-4 weeks. I have seen far too many bloodwork examples to concur with 1 single study. Given my first hand experience I would bet any sum of money the testosterone in question is <60% purity whereas I've never seen Watson below 86%. To believe 400mg of Testosterone made by watson could keep you as low as 1600 (per my comment above you disagreed with in saying 200mg could actually only raise you to 800) would assume these people running 500mg/week are hardly breaking 1000 on the test levels which is hardly out of the "Natural range." You might get 1/10 UGL's that have >75 purity test, again first hand experience, so with that being said, people running 500mg/week on first cycles have about a 1/10 chance of getting out of the 300-1000 (roughly) nd/gl range.

Jersey/CEO agreed upon theory: Watson (for sake of pharma brand) at 200mg/week can keep you as low as 800 nd/gl
My theory: 200mg of watson per week should elevate far beyond and up to 1800mg if split injections.
-assuming Watson has never tested below 86% in the 15+ vials I have tested over the years, both opened, expired etc.

If we double the injected dose of Watson per your guys' theory, we'd be injecting 400mg/week which is not unheard of for a first cycle with UGL gear.
-Lets assume most UGL gear is 50-60% purity, sad - but completely true.

If someone is using 400mg/week of a 60% purity product with your thesis, there levels would equate to roughly 1100, which is hardly better than natural and most assuredly not worth shutting down your HPTA

If someone is using 400mg/week of a 50% purity product with your thesis, there levels would equate to <1000 (possibly lower than some people natural) and definitely not worth shutting down your HPTA

Im not trying to be a dick here guys, merely giving you a different viewpoint.

 

[jerseydevil]

Uh, I have done a shitload of my own bloodwork.... almost all twice weekly injections. Both pharma and UGL... still bullshit. 200mg a week is still 200mg a week no matter how you inject it. The time to get blood drawn is the issue.

Present proof and then I will listen. I go nuts with you fucking 'theory' guys that spew shit without any actual numbers, because in the end it's the lab numbers that count.