Another new guy

[1977_1]

Hello gents,

I'm new to the Evo fam and enjoying all of the access to info. I'm 37, 5'8", 170 and have been lifting seriously the last 3 years. Before that I was the avg workout 5 months take 7 months off guy. I've ran two cycles of sust recently with excellent results. I'm branching out and just picked up some test-e. I know a lot of people like to run tren-e with their test. I'm new to tren and have read that tren-a is preferred by many because of it's short esters and the ability to adjust on the fly.

My main question is, is it a waste of money to run a long ester with a short? Basically should I stack tren-a toward the end of my test cycle? Thanks for any help. I"m stoked to be part of this community.

Thanks,
77

 

[jp4355]

Welcome to Evo !
While it's not a waste to stack a Long Ester with a Short Ester.
You need to take into consideration the different Pinning Schedule of each compound................................. JP
P.S.
For some it would be more of an Inconvenience.
P.S.S.
How long of a Cycle were you planning on doing, like 10 or 12 Weeks.
I would run the Tren from the Beginning.
IMO - I would run the Tren higher than the Test - I have less sides and a better outcome when I've done it this way.

 

[gearhead]

bro welcome to evo family...if you using tren i would go with longer ester easier to inject....add cardarine gw to combat the tren sides...

 

[Nairbe]

Welcome to Evo!

 

[Ben dilly]

Welcome to EVO.

 

[powersteroids]

Welcome to Evo bro, good to have you !

 

[Mountain-Man]

Welcome bro I would also run tren e less pinning and u can start at low dose and adjust as ur cycle progress

 

[LevButlerov]

bro welcome to evo family...if you using tren i would go with longer ester easier to inject....add cardarine gw to combat the tren sides...

That is one good advice. Also, don't forget to use tren only stacked with test, and in my personal opinion you should keep the test dosages higher than the tren.

And welcome to the EVO community!

 

[stevesmi]

I prefer longer esters only because I hate injecting lol

 

[GhostZ71]

Welcome to EVO!

There are different reasons for running short vs long Esters. One thing to take into consideration are the sides. Everyone deals with trend sides a little differently and considering you've never run tren I would run tren a since it's a shorter ester and if you don't seem to deal well with the sides you can come off and the sides will subside fairly quickly. Just my .02

 

[gymrat827]

welcome, welcome to our spot.

 

[anabols-markt.com]

Welcom to our comunity man

 

[8Plates]

Welcome to Evolutionary

 

[TX !]

Welcome to the board!

 

[ASB]

Welcome, I'm also a new here)

 

[1977_1]

Welcome to Evo !
While it's not a waste to stack a Long Ester with a Short Ester.
You need to take into consideration the different Pinning Schedule of each compound................................. JP
P.S.
For some it would be more of an Inconvenience.
P.S.S.
How long of a Cycle were you planning on doing, like 10 or 12 Weeks.
I would run the Tren from the Beginning.
IMO - I would run the Tren higher than the Test - I have less sides and a better outcome when I've done it this way.

Thanks for the feedback. I was planning on running a 12 week cycle and coming in at week four with the tren. From what I've read, the tren shuts you down almost immediately (if using the A.) I've also read heard to run the tren higher than the test like you suggested. Looks like i'm saving the the A for later and putting in an order for some E. I appreciate the help.

 

[1977_1]

Thanks for all the input and welcoming words fellas. I appreciate the hell out of it!

77

 

[m_groove]

Welcome to EVO

 

[hurricane]

Hello gents,

I'm new to the Evo fam and enjoying all of the access to info. I'm 37, 5'8", 170 and have been lifting seriously the last 3 years. Before that I was the avg workout 5 months take 7 months off guy. I've ran two cycles of sust recently with excellent results. I'm branching out and just picked up some test-e. I know a lot of people like to run tren-e with their test. I'm new to tren and have read that tren-a is preferred by many because of it's short esters and the ability to adjust on the fly.

My main question is, is it a waste of money to run a long ester with a short? Basically should I stack tren-a toward the end of my test cycle? Thanks for any help. I"m stoked to be part of this community.

Thanks,
77

its true with tren a , its more easy to manage sides due to the shorter half life .I would use tren a before tren e