Hume Scale / Smart Scale Accuracy Discussion
Wanted to make a post separate from my gear log and see what everyone’s experience has been with the Hume scale or similar smart scales.
I know BIA scales get a ton of hate and obviously they’re not going to be 100% accurate like a DEXA, but I’ve been using mine consistently for about 8 months now and honestly it’s been pretty interesting.
The biggest thing I’ve noticed — I’ve never had a crazy “what the hell?” reading where it randomly jumps all over the place. The trend has actually matched my physique changes almost perfectly. When I was pushing calories and gaining size, lean mass trended up. During my cut, body fat has consistently trended down right along with what I’m seeing in the mirror, waist measurements, vascularity, and conditioning.
Makes me wonder if people dismiss these things too quickly because they expect the exact BF% number to be perfect, instead of using it as a tracking tool. Maybe the number itself isn’t gospel, but if hydration, timing, and conditions stay consistent, could it actually be a pretty valuable tool for tracking trends?
Curious what everyone else has seen. Anyone compared their Hume readings over time against DEXA, calipers, stage condition, etc.?
Wanted to make a post separate from my gear log and see what everyone’s experience has been with the Hume scale or similar smart scales.
I know BIA scales get a ton of hate and obviously they’re not going to be 100% accurate like a DEXA, but I’ve been using mine consistently for about 8 months now and honestly it’s been pretty interesting.
The biggest thing I’ve noticed — I’ve never had a crazy “what the hell?” reading where it randomly jumps all over the place. The trend has actually matched my physique changes almost perfectly. When I was pushing calories and gaining size, lean mass trended up. During my cut, body fat has consistently trended down right along with what I’m seeing in the mirror, waist measurements, vascularity, and conditioning.
Makes me wonder if people dismiss these things too quickly because they expect the exact BF% number to be perfect, instead of using it as a tracking tool. Maybe the number itself isn’t gospel, but if hydration, timing, and conditions stay consistent, could it actually be a pretty valuable tool for tracking trends?
Curious what everyone else has seen. Anyone compared their Hume readings over time against DEXA, calipers, stage condition, etc.?
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 












