Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
What do you guys think of 777? i’m currently on mk677 22mg a night and experienced all the benefits i hoped for with little to no serious side effects (that i know of, haven’t checked bloods yet). i’ve heard 777 is supposedly everything that 677 is minus the side effects. how would that work? aren’t the side effects somewhat a sign of it working, meaning 777 could be weaker? wondering what everyone’s thoughts were on this.
Stick with mk677.
Stick to actual hgh
LevButlerov
Veteran Mod
Head Moderator
Raptor Labs VIP
UGL OZ VIP
Senior Moderator
EVO V.I.P.
Domestic-Supply.com
good to have you ask @Clarpin but first why do you want to use mk677 or any HGH booster? are you on cycle? training dieting? tell us more.
For info, nutrobal MK677 works by pushing GH through ghrelin signaling so the hunger, water retention, and sleep effects are part of how it does its job, not just side effects.
mk677 is basically mimicking GH benefits with fewer negatives, but that usually means weaker GH stimulation overall, so yes fewer sides often equals less hgh boost. If 677 is working well for you already, 777 is more of a mild alternative than an upgrade. I would stick to what works.
@BeMe @HarleyGuy @s.gentz
@Allupfromhere @Pigsy @Dreamer @Freki @R.AP
@waggat @Yuri @rizzlekdizzle @Grumpy
I've honestly only used 677, so I do not know about 777, and that is the reality. You'll see that 95% of people have used 677, and that's what we stick with.
Bros, they say MK-777 is stronger than MK-677. Why don't you try it and let us know what you think?
25 milligrams of MK-677 is tried and true. I'm not sure why you would want to use something that's unproven.
From what I know, MK-677 seems to be the stronger option, but it hasn't been used very often.
You can certainly try using MK-677. Not a lot of people have tried it. It's not something that is well reviewed or well used in the bodybuilding community.
I’ve been sooo waiting for this question as there’s a ton of crap going around about 777.
677 was designed properly to pulse GH and increase IGF1 via reliable and high grehlin receptor activation. Yes it increases hunger as it mimics ghrelin and induces some mild water retention but it’s been around over 20 years since first researched and has so much data there’s no doubt it can be used (arguably) even in place of GH if GH is unaffordable.
777 is literally only a one year old analogue of 677 that claims to produce less water retention and less hunger by having less binding to the grehlin receptor yet somehow does a better job? I don’t buy it.
They are both grehlin receptor agonists so I don’t buy the idea that 777 would be a better option since by its very design it’s a less potent grehlin agonist.
I say stick to 677 and where the data lies and use some will power or take it right before bed if night binging is an issue.
Theres some designer steroids I’d be open to like superdrol or M1T but not designer analogue agonists of this type. If it is in fact pulsing GH (no data yet) then we still don’t know how and that (to me at the moment) is dangerous.
@LevButlerov We should start an MK677 megathread possibly where long time users of it can post their results over periods of time with dosages? Just thinking out loud now.
Last edited:
MK 677 would definitely be my go to
