Think of it this way, Yazdani93. The chemical known as glyphosate (the active ingredient in Monsanto's "Round Up" weed killer) has been known to be a carcinogen for approximately the past twenty years. Yet throughout nearly the totality of those twenty-years it was only non-profit sources of news and information, e.g., Pacifica Radio, Free Speech TV, Mother Jones, the Nation, etc., that were willing to report that fact. Simply stated, glysophate's carcinogenic status was completely ignored by commercial/pay-to-play media sources, e.g., ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CNN, Time, Newsweek, etc.
Lately, however, as the movement against glysophate and thus Monsanto has grown to epic proportions, the commercial media is no longer able to ignore the story and has, in fact, and of late, begun to cover it.
But why did the commercial media ignore this vitally important story for the past twenty years?
Answer: Because the commercial/pay-to-play media accepts commercial sponsorship/money from Monsanto in turn for Monsanto advertising its "Round Up" within these media outlets.
In other words, no matter how criminally neglegent Monsanto has behaved throughout these twenty-years, the media sources who accepted money from Monsanto weren't about to jeopardize that funding by telling their audiences the truth about Round Up.
Now, of course, none of this has anything to do with AAS nor anyone that sells AAS. But you should be getting the picture because it sure a'int rocket science.