Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIESUGL OZUGFREAKOxygenPharm

Suspended RRR Peptides introduction

Suspended until further notice - do not interact
Small touch down, so far reta and bpc has been really great, looking forward to try ss-31 and mots-c. Will report how it goes what all the hype abt this peptide.
IMG_3244.webp
 
Thanks for the touchdown pics guys! As always, we look forward to hearing your experiences and any feedback!

Moving forward, our products will be delivered in an more appealing manner 🥳
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20251119_212822.webp
    IMG_20251119_212822.webp
    1.8 MB · Views: 173
  • IMG_20251119_212759.webp
    IMG_20251119_212759.webp
    1.6 MB · Views: 161
Thanks for the touchdown pics guys! As always, we look forward to hearing your experiences and any feedback!

Moving forward, our products will be delivered in an more appealing manner 🥳
Gonna need you to ship me some empty boxes and plastic holders... those are amazing bro
 
Thank you to all members for your continued support. We are pleased to announce that we will now be conducting independent testing on our products. Our first set of results is expected to be released within the next 2–3 weeks.

As vendors, we believe it is our responsibility to offer more than simply reselling products based on supplier-provided Janoshik reports. We are committed to ensuring genuine quality and transparency, rather than relying solely on documentation that may not accurately reflect the products being supplied.

We have identified instances where supplier reports are being reused by multiple vendors, and in some cases, it appears that a single supplier report is being presented as proof of quality while the actual products shipped originate from entirely different sources. For this reason, we strongly encourage all members to independently verify any test results they receive.

Verification can be completed through the official Janoshik website using the task number located in the top-left corner of the report and the unique code at the bottom. If these are not visible, the QR code can be scanned to access the original testing page directly.

Official Janoshik reports also include a photograph of the tested sample. These images are sometimes omitted at the vendor’s request, as they reveal vial lid colours—details that may require additional testing for future batches if lids change.

For our own testing, we will be providing full, unaltered reports including all sample images. This ensures complete transparency and allows members to confirm that the results correspond to the exact vials they receive.

Once again, thank you for the ongoing support that has allowed us to reach this stage in our growth. Your engagement, conversations, and trust truly make all of this worthwhile.
 
Thank you to all members for your continued support. We are pleased to announce that we will now be conducting independent testing on our products. Our first set of results is expected to be released within the next 2–3 weeks.

As vendors, we believe it is our responsibility to offer more than simply reselling products based on supplier-provided Janoshik reports. We are committed to ensuring genuine quality and transparency, rather than relying solely on documentation that may not accurately reflect the products being supplied.

We have identified instances where supplier reports are being reused by multiple vendors, and in some cases, it appears that a single supplier report is being presented as proof of quality while the actual products shipped originate from entirely different sources. For this reason, we strongly encourage all members to independently verify any test results they receive.

Verification can be completed through the official Janoshik website using the task number located in the top-left corner of the report and the unique code at the bottom. If these are not visible, the QR code can be scanned to access the original testing page directly.

Official Janoshik reports also include a photograph of the tested sample. These images are sometimes omitted at the vendor’s request, as they reveal vial lid colours—details that may require additional testing for future batches if lids change.

For our own testing, we will be providing full, unaltered reports including all sample images. This ensures complete transparency and allows members to confirm that the results correspond to the exact vials they receive.

Once again, thank you for the ongoing support that has allowed us to reach this stage in our growth. Your engagement, conversations, and trust truly make all of this worthwhile.
Thank you for this mate. Great to see the initiative. Will provide lot of confidence to the community and no doubt in your business!

Now I am even more excited for those mots-c kits! ha.
 
Thank you to all members for your continued support. We are pleased to announce that we will now be conducting independent testing on our products. Our first set of results is expected to be released within the next 2–3 weeks.

As vendors, we believe it is our responsibility to offer more than simply reselling products based on supplier-provided Janoshik reports. We are committed to ensuring genuine quality and transparency, rather than relying solely on documentation that may not accurately reflect the products being supplied.

We have identified instances where supplier reports are being reused by multiple vendors, and in some cases, it appears that a single supplier report is being presented as proof of quality while the actual products shipped originate from entirely different sources. For this reason, we strongly encourage all members to independently verify any test results they receive.

Verification can be completed through the official Janoshik website using the task number located in the top-left corner of the report and the unique code at the bottom. If these are not visible, the QR code can be scanned to access the original testing page directly.

Official Janoshik reports also include a photograph of the tested sample. These images are sometimes omitted at the vendor’s request, as they reveal vial lid colours—details that may require additional testing for future batches if lids change.

For our own testing, we will be providing full, unaltered reports including all sample images. This ensures complete transparency and allows members to confirm that the results correspond to the exact vials they receive.

Once again, thank you for the ongoing support that has allowed us to reach this stage in our growth. Your engagement, conversations, and trust truly make all of this worthwhile.
Also I would just add that I hope it sets a good precedent!
 
Thank you to all members for your continued support. We are pleased to announce that we will now be conducting independent testing on our products. Our first set of results is expected to be released within the next 2–3 weeks.

As vendors, we believe it is our responsibility to offer more than simply reselling products based on supplier-provided Janoshik reports. We are committed to ensuring genuine quality and transparency, rather than relying solely on documentation that may not accurately reflect the products being supplied.

We have identified instances where supplier reports are being reused by multiple vendors, and in some cases, it appears that a single supplier report is being presented as proof of quality while the actual products shipped originate from entirely different sources. For this reason, we strongly encourage all members to independently verify any test results they receive.

Verification can be completed through the official Janoshik website using the task number located in the top-left corner of the report and the unique code at the bottom. If these are not visible, the QR code can be scanned to access the original testing page directly.

Official Janoshik reports also include a photograph of the tested sample. These images are sometimes omitted at the vendor’s request, as they reveal vial lid colours—details that may require additional testing for future batches if lids change.

For our own testing, we will be providing full, unaltered reports including all sample images. This ensures complete transparency and allows members to confirm that the results correspond to the exact vials they receive.

Once again, thank you for the ongoing support that has allowed us to reach this stage in our growth. Your engagement, conversations, and trust truly make all of this worthwhile.
Awesome commitment ,makes for great business.
 
Touchdown from @RRRaus

Fantastic communication, next day delivery, very helpful and responsive.

Vials look gorgeous. Will start using on Saturday.
Pinned 5mg MOTS-C for first time this morning 2 hours pre AM fasted cardio with GH.

I am very impressed. Ran 15km @ average 140 BPM then did a 20 minute cooldown cycle @ average 125 BPM. Burnt 1k+ calories over 2 hours. And still feel like I have a lot of energy. Dropped pre-workout / caffeine as well prior to this cardio to see effect on energy.

Pinning 5mg today and 5mg tomorrow morning pre AM fasted cardio as a trial. Next week will be moving to 3.33mg pre AM fasted cardio (10mg per week).

Only first time using - so its early to judge - but I am a big fan so far. Thank you @RRRaus
 
Pinned 5mg MOTS-C for first time this morning 2 hours pre AM fasted cardio with GH.

I am very impressed. Ran 15km @ average 140 BPM then did a 20 minute cooldown cycle @ average 125 BPM. Burnt 1k+ calories over 2 hours. And still feel like I have a lot of energy. Dropped pre-workout / caffeine as well prior to this cardio to see effect on energy.

Pinning 5mg today and 5mg tomorrow morning pre AM fasted cardio as a trial. Next week will be moving to 3.33mg pre AM fasted cardio (10mg per week).

Only first time using - so its early to judge - but I am a big fan so far. Thank you @RRRaus
Hey mate, great to hear it's doing its thing for you!

Thank you for the support:)
 
Good afternoon Evo family!

We are out of stock on a couple of items. A current list will be posted below.

If there is better offer advertised, please bring it to us and we will attempt to match it :).

Min order $150 inc shipping
Shipping $20 or free over $300


MOTS-C
• 10mg – $60 (kit $450)

Ipamorelin
• 5mg – $50

Tesamorelin
• 5mg – $60

SS-31
• 10mg – $80

GHK-Cu
• 100mg – $70 (kit $500)

PT-141
• 10mg – $45

Cagrilintide
• 5mg – $70

Retatrutide
• 10mg – $110 OUT OF STOCK
• 20mg – $160 (kit 1200)

Tirzepatide
• 10mg – $100
• 20mg – $145 (kit 1000)

BPC-157
• 10mg – $80 (kit 600)

TB-500 (TB4)
• 10mg – $90

Reusable Peptide Pen
• $50 OUT OF STOCK

HGH
• 100IU - $250
• 240IU - $450

Shipping
• $20 or free over $300

Payment via BTC

Contact

Threema ID:
F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.33
 
Less than 24 hour turn around touchdown i don't want to wreck the packaging super sexy porn i might just frame the phuka 😂
Great coms super fast delivery will try product later today

Thank you brother 1st order of many to come 🙏
 

Attachments

  • IMG20251126123019.webp
    IMG20251126123019.webp
    466 KB · Views: 148
IMG_8393.webp


✨ RRR Peptides Retatrutide touchdown! ✨
Australia Post took my package on a longer-than-expected journey, but RRR Peptides were flawless throughout. They kept me updated every step of the way and even raised an inquiry with AusPost when a scanner routing issue occurred — showing just how committed they are to customer care.

Now my Retatrutide 20mg x 2 has arrived safely, and I’m excited to get started. Already looking forward to trying more of their peptide range — huge thanks to RRR for the outstanding service and reliability! 🙌
 
Thank you to all members for your continued support. We are pleased to announce that we will now be conducting independent testing on our products. Our first set of results is expected to be released within the next 2–3 weeks.

As vendors, we believe it is our responsibility to offer more than simply reselling products based on supplier-provided Janoshik reports. We are committed to ensuring genuine quality and transparency, rather than relying solely on documentation that may not accurately reflect the products being supplied.

We have identified instances where supplier reports are being reused by multiple vendors, and in some cases, it appears that a single supplier report is being presented as proof of quality while the actual products shipped originate from entirely different sources. For this reason, we strongly encourage all members to independently verify any test results they receive.

Verification can be completed through the official Janoshik website using the task number located in the top-left corner of the report and the unique code at the bottom. If these are not visible, the QR code can be scanned to access the original testing page directly.

Official Janoshik reports also include a photograph of the tested sample. These images are sometimes omitted at the vendor’s request, as they reveal vial lid colours—details that may require additional testing for future batches if lids change.

For our own testing, we will be providing full, unaltered reports including all sample images. This ensures complete transparency and allows members to confirm that the results correspond to the exact vials they receive.

Once again, thank you for the ongoing support that has allowed us to reach this stage in our growth. Your engagement, conversations, and trust truly make all of this worthwhile.
Great work @RRRaus, this is what's going to differentiate those that are taking this seriously and want to provide quality stock and earn the prices they are setting and those that have just found a supplier somewhere and don't want to put the money into confirming what their customers are putting in their bodies. Respect.
 
Great work @RRRaus, this is what's going to differentiate those that are taking this seriously and want to provide quality stock and earn the prices they are setting and those that have just found a supplier somewhere and don't want to put the money into confirming what their customers are putting in their bodies. Respect.
Thanks for the message — we’re clearly on the same page.

Relying solely on a redacted supplier screenshot, without any form of independent verification, offers limited credibility. This is particularly the case when there is no clear evidence confirming that the results relate to the same product or batch.

Out of respect for customers, and considering the prices they have been paying for some time, we believe that independently testing the actual product is the minimum standard vendors should uphold.

While this approach may mean our range is not as extensive as others, our goal is to reach a point where every batch is tested. This is part of our ongoing commitment to transparency, quality, and the same level of service our customers have come to expect.

We received a number of comments regarding our competitive pricing when we first established our online presence, particularly around how it might impact the broader market. Evidently, the effect has not been negative, as many vendors have since adjusted their prices significantly. With product costs remaining relatively stable, it does raise the question of whether customers had previously been paying more than necessary.


Looking ahead, we hope to see more vendors adopt transparent testing practices, as this would ultimately contribute to a stronger and more trustworthy Australian market. There is currently an “AU Approved Sources” Janoshik thread, though it contains very limited—if any—peptide testing results. We hope that our commitment to testing and transparency encourages positive change within the Australian community.
 
Thanks for the message — we’re clearly on the same page.

Relying solely on a redacted supplier screenshot, without any form of independent verification, offers limited credibility. This is particularly the case when there is no clear evidence confirming that the results relate to the same product or batch.

Out of respect for customers, and considering the prices they have been paying for some time, we believe that independently testing the actual product is the minimum standard vendors should uphold.

While this approach may mean our range is not as extensive as others, our goal is to reach a point where every batch is tested. This is part of our ongoing commitment to transparency, quality, and the same level of service our customers have come to expect.

We received a number of comments regarding our competitive pricing when we first established our online presence, particularly around how it might impact the broader market. Evidently, the effect has not been negative, as many vendors have since adjusted their prices significantly. With product costs remaining relatively stable, it does raise the question of whether customers had previously been paying more than necessary.


Looking ahead, we hope to see more vendors adopt transparent testing practices, as this would ultimately contribute to a stronger and more trustworthy Australian market. There is currently an “AU Approved Sources” Janoshik thread, though it contains very limited—if any—peptide testing results. We hope that our commitment to testing and transparency encourages positive change within the Australian community.
Nice work brother, genuinely good to see you putting in the effort for the consumers. Getting every single batch tested is a massive commitment, especially with the cost of running peptides through Jano. Keen to see the results drop legend, pretty sure everyone else will be too 🔥
 
Relying solely on a redacted supplier screenshot, without any form of independent verification, offers limited credibility. This is particularly the case when there is no clear evidence confirming that the results relate to the same product or batch.
With no disrespect brother this would be no different to the consumer relying on your screenshot test results and you being the supplier in that particular case.
I do however repspect your effort 🙏
 
With no disrespect brother this would be no different to the consumer relying on your screenshot test results and you being the supplier in that particular case.
I do however repspect your effort 🙏
No disrespect taken at all. Just as you raised the concerns on our recent price adjustment, I would like to think the same level of scrutiny is applied to all vendors equally.

The difference is that our testing reports will not be redacted and will include an image of the exact product that was tested. As mentioned earlier, this image is part of the report and included in the cost.

When a report simply states that a product tested at a certain level but provides no accompanying image, there is no way to verify that the product supplied is from the same batch that was tested. By providing a clear photo, we take an additional step to ensure customers can see that their vial matches the one used in the analysis.

In consistency with transparency, let me ask you two question's;

•Do you think it's acceptable for vendors to provide a janoshik test without an image of the product?

•Do you think with the markups that are applied to peptides, Vendors should be testing their product themselves?

Again - thank you for engaging in an open discussion that will contribute to improving the Australian community :)

Ultimately, it is a buyer’s market, and our goal is to strengthen the Australian community by setting higher standards—standards that should already be the norm.
 
Nice work brother, genuinely good to see you putting in the effort for the consumers. Getting every single batch tested is a massive commitment, especially with the cost of running peptides through Jano. Keen to see the results drop legend, pretty sure everyone else will be too 🔥
Thank you mate! It is a large commitment- something we believe should be the norm.

Grabbing a bunch of kits from a supplier and then reselling it at a substantial markup without providing any additional value, should not be the norm.

The cost of testing for majority of products is covered by the sale of less than a kit of that particular peptide, sometimes even a few vials.
 
No disrespect taken at all. Just as you raised the concerns on our recent price adjustment, I would like to think the same level of scrutiny is applied to all vendors equally.
Glad to here as it genuinely isnt my intention🙏
It wasnt a concern, it was just an opinion brother there was no emotion attached to what i had mentioned earlier about the price adjustment and i made a point of saying that ultimately your business is yours operate how ever your like.
I wasn't trying to scrutinise you at all, it was but a mere observation. So please, understand this is not a personal attack on you at all just a discussion.
The difference is that our testing reports will not be redacted and will include an image of the exact product that was tested. As mentioned earlier, this image is part of the report and included in the cost.
Agree with you on this for sure..
When a report simply states that a product tested at a certain level but provides no accompanying image, there is no way to verify that the product supplied is from the same batch that was tested. By providing a clear photo, we take an additional step to ensure customers can see that their vial matches the one used in the analysis.
Of course brother your completely right here. There is no way to verify the alleged test is the same batch thats being sold. Would also need to see batch numbers on each test to further the chance validation.
In consistency with transparency, let me ask you two question's;

•Do you think it's acceptable for vendors to provide a janoshik test without an image of the product?

•Do you think with the markups that are applied to peptides, Vendors should be testing their product themselves?
without doubt it can be more reassuring to see the sample tested shown on the test it self... especially for a new vendor that isnt yet trusted on evo or hasnt built community trust through good customer service or there reviews from active loggers.
I feel a janoshik test is only the first step for a lab. On going use and reviews paired with results is a much more accurate indication of whether a consumer should base their opinion to use a product or not.

If vendors dont test products themselves bad products come to light extremely fast around here.
But yes, janosik tests are the first attraction to a new lab for sure.

I dont feel the profit margin of what a lab makes determines what they should do. I think a labs honesty should especially trying to cut their teeth in the current market.

Again - thank you for engaging in an open discussion that will contribute to improving the Australian community :)
No need for thanks, doesnt say much for us if we cant have an open discussion haha. Trying to improve the aussie scene is what takes us to the top together.
Ultimately, it is a buyer’s market, and our goal is to strengthen the Australian community by setting higher standards—standards that should already be the norm.
I can tell you have strong feelings towards a higher standard which is great, how come you werent already testing each batch before you sell if you felt so strong about it legend?
 
Thank you mate! It is a large commitment- something we believe should be the norm.
Thats a good point of view my brother and actions speak louder then words so looking forward seeing the consistent tests.
Grabbing a bunch of kits from a supplier and then reselling it at a substantial markup without providing any additional value, should not be the norm.
Sorry brother this part here is a little conflicting though. As of right now, though it may not be as substantial as others, are you not just purchasing a bunch of kits to sell with a markup without providing and 'further value', being transparent jano tests, as you describe?

This just gives a feel that your directing your energy at what you feel other labs should be doing rather then already doing yourself what you say should be the norm... because currently it would stand that you are operating in the exact way your opinion stands against.
 
Last edited:
Glad to here as it genuinely isnt my intention🙏
It wasnt a concern, it was just an opinion brother there was no emotion attached to what i had mentioned earlier about the price adjustment and i made a point of saying that ultimately your business is yours operate how ever your like.
I wasn't trying to scrutinise you at all, it was but a mere observation. So please, understand this is not a personal attack on you at all just a discussion.
We are on the same page mate, transparency is key and resorting to personal attacks or insults over a constructive discussion isn't something I would expect from a member with genuine care :).
Of course brother your completely right here. There is no way to verify the alleged test is the same batch thats being sold. Would also need to see batch numbers on each test to further the chance validation
It's funny you mention that mate as we may have a suprise for you soon haha.
without doubt it can be more reassuring to see the sample tested shown on the test it self... especially for a new vendor that isnt yet trusted on evo or hasnt built community trust through good customer service or there reviews from active loggers.
I feel a janoshik test is only the first step for a lab. On going use and reviews paired with results is a much more accurate indication of whether a consumer should base their opinion to use a product or not.

If vendors dont test products themselves bad products come to light extremely fast around here.
But yes, janosik tests are the first attraction to a new lab for sure.

I dont feel the profit margin of what a lab makes determines what they should do. I think a labs honesty should especially trying to cut their teeth in the current market.
I disagree on this point as a whole. Why should a vendor who is established be any less required to provide testing results than a new vendor? An established vendor has gone through the vetting process and should be held to a higher standard, is that not the point of the tiered vendor system?

I've not seen much if any peptide testing done, how are people to know if it's underdosed by 20% when there's many other variables. I have had customers using other vendors products before coming to me and then commenting on the differences in effects.

I agree on the profit front, so why aren't vendors testing their products?

For AAS vendors I see it different, you are trusting the vendor as they are the one brewing the product. People get blood tests which show levels etc. For peptides, nobody is producing it themselves and have no part in the manufacturing process. How do you test the efficacy of a peptide when there are numerous variables for each individual's response.
I can tell you have strong feelings towards a higher standard which is great, how come you werent already testing each batch before you sell if you felt so strong about it legend?
Haha, yes mate very strong feelings towards high standards. As we started out we didn't have the funds to get enough kits that testing each product was viable.

We expressed earlier in this same thread that our intention was to see which products Evo members had most interest in and test those. We have reached that point thanks to the support of members here :).

If we had the capital to begin with, we would of been able to start out venture with testing. It's taken us about a month to get to this point - longer than I would have liked!

If people want to buy products based off supplier tests, that's their prerogative. Unfortunately that's how we had to commence our service. Just because that's how it's commenced, is no excuse to continue on that trajectory in the name of profits.
 
Thats a good point of view my brother and actions speak louder then words so looking forward seeing the consistent tests.

Sorry brother this part here is a little conflicting though. As of right now, though it may not be as substantial as others, are you not just purchasing a bunch of kits to sell with a markup without providing and 'further value', being transparent jano tests, as you describe?

This just gives a feel that your directing your energy at what you feel other labs should be doing rather then already doing yourself what you say should be the norm... because currently it would stand that you are operating in the exact way your opinion stands against.
Don't be sorry at all mate.

We have been doing exactly as others vendors as I have outlined in my response above. We didn't believe in the level of the marks ups and came with a lower price.

We aren't providing any further value through our peptides than if customers were to buy them direct. In line with this lack of value, we introduced our pen kits to bring some value to customers.
 
We are on the same page mate, transparency is key and resorting to personal attacks or insults over a constructive discussion isn't something I would expect from a member with genuine care :).
Of course brother 🤝
It's funny you mention that mate as we may have a suprise for you soon haha.
Awesome stuff mate 👌
I disagree on this point as a whole. Why should a vendor who is established be any less required to provide testing results than a new vendor? An established vendor has gone through the vetting process and should be held to a higher standard, is that not the point of the tiered vendor system?
I think you have mistaken me here ledge, i didnt say they shouldnt be any less required to provide test results. Im saying that jano tests are the first point of action. On going consumer use with personal reviews and results is a better indication of consistency for a product. After this, customer service and community opinion based on positive reviews carries a lab on the teir system. As a reputation maintains, improves or degrades changes will reflect on their teir ranking.

The community and consumer reviews benifit you also as a lab/brand further then the jano testing alone.
I've not seen much if any peptide testing done, how are people to know if it's underdosed by 20% when there's many other variables. I have had customers using other vendors products before coming to me and then commenting on the differences in effects.
This completely supports my point of value and power of consumer reviews.
I agree on the profit front, so why aren't vendors testing their products?
I agree that they should but as we all know a brands reputation isnt made and then set permanently it still has to be maintained from positive responses through community reviews and use not just jano tests.
For AAS vendors I see it different, you are trusting the vendor as they are the one brewing the product. People get blood tests which show levels etc. For peptides, nobody is producing it themselves and have no part in the manufacturing process. How do you test the efficacy of a peptide when there are numerous variables for each individual's response.
Yes agreed much more applicable to aas vendors for this reason. However still doesnt devalue the influence of reviews from consumer use.
Haha, yes mate very strong feelings towards high standards. As we started out we didn't have the funds to get enough kits that testing each product was viable.

We expressed earlier in this same thread that our intention was to see which products Evo members had most interest in and test those. We have reached that point thanks to the support of members here :).

If we had the capital to begin with, we would of been able to start out venture with testing. It's taken us about a month to get to this point - longer than I would have liked!

If people want to buy products based off supplier tests, that's their prerogative. Unfortunately that's how we had to commence our service. Just because that's how it's commenced, is no excuse to continue on that trajectory in the name of profits.
I understand brother as you are first getting things off the ground, that your progress has been made off positive customer reviews or your product and service and this is a point im making.
Don't be sorry at all mate.

We have been doing exactly as others vendors as I have outlined in my response above. We didn't believe in the level of the marks ups and came with a lower price.

We aren't providing any further value through our peptides than if customers were to buy them direct. In line with this lack of value, we introduced our pen kits to bring some value to customers.
But here it is...

Kudos to you for offering something extra to create more value especially since you’re not yet offering Jano testing yourself.

Couple of things I’ll leave you with, bro. I genuinely wish you all the best, and if there’s ever anything I can do to help, just reach out. Growing and supporting the Aussie community members and vendors is my main priority.

What you’re aiming for with the testing is honestly an awesome direction.

However, it’s starting to come across a bit like a marketing angle aimed at other vendors for personal gain. I’m not defending anyone who isn’t pushing for transparency, the Aussie community is quick to call out any vendor or product that doesn’t match what’s being advertised.

What earns respect is a brand focusing on its own transparency and actually delivering what it promises not comparing itself to what they think others should be doing.

That’s not community development, that’s marketing strategy.

Dodgey labs always weed themselves out naturally, brother.
 
Of course brother 🤝

Awesome stuff mate 👌

I think you have mistaken me here ledge, i didnt say they shouldnt be any less required to provide test results. Im saying that jano tests are the first point of action. On going consumer use with personal reviews and results is a better indication of consistency for a product. After this, customer service and community opinion based on positive reviews carries a lab on the teir system. As a reputation maintains, improves or degrades changes will reflect on their teir ranking.

The community and consumer reviews benifit you also as a lab/brand further then the jano testing alone.

This completely supports my point of value and power of consumer reviews.

I agree that they should but as we all know a brands reputation isnt made and then set permanently it still has to be maintained from positive responses through community reviews and use not just jano tests.

Yes agreed much more applicable to aas vendors for this reason. However still doesnt devalue the influence of reviews from consumer use.

I understand brother as you are first getting things off the ground, that your progress has been made off positive customer reviews or your product and service and this is a point im making.

But here it is...

Kudos to you for offering something extra to create more value especially since you’re not yet offering Jano testing yourself.

Couple of things I’ll leave you with, bro. I genuinely wish you all the best, and if there’s ever anything I can do to help, just reach out. Growing and supporting the Aussie community members and vendors is my main priority.

What you’re aiming for with the testing is honestly an awesome direction.

However, it’s starting to come across a bit like a marketing angle aimed at other vendors for personal gain. I’m not defending anyone who isn’t pushing for transparency, the Aussie community is quick to call out any vendor or product that doesn’t match what’s being advertised.

What earns respect is a brand focusing on its own transparency and actually delivering what it promises not comparing itself to what they think others should be doing.

That’s not community development, that’s marketing strategy.

Dodgey labs always weed themselves out naturally, brother.
Thank you for your point of view mate.

I did misunderstand your reasoning on the tests. I disagree that customer reviews should negate the need for testing but that appears something we hold different opinions on.

You say reputation should be upheld by community reviews and not just Jano tests - my exact issue with the current market is that there is no independent testing being done by vendors.

You pointing out that we have done nothing differently is not a "gotcha" moment. We have been clear and transparent in our plans.

I appreciate your view that it comes across as a marketing angle. If wanting to deliver a better service to consumers is a marking angle then let's call it that.

The community is lucky to have people like you who hold all vendors to the same level of scrutiny :)

Again, thank you for the kind words and engaging in a constructive discussion, that's why we have these forums!
 
You say reputation should be upheld by community reviews and not just Jano tests - my exact issue with the current market is that there is no independent testing being done by vendors.
And thought you maybe right, there is many community reviews for other vendors that do influence reputation. An amalgamation of both is what is truly needed and i feel we will both agree on that.
You pointing out that we have done nothing differently is not a "gotcha" moment. We have been clear and transparent in our plans.

I appreciate your view that it comes across as a marketing angle. If wanting to deliver a better service to consumers is a marking angle then let's call it that.
Wasnt meant to be a 'gotchya' moment. You wanting to give a better service i fully supported.
What you’re aiming for with the testing is honestly an awesome direction.
It was the premature comparison to other vendors before you had implemented the change itself it what i referred to as what felt like a marketing ploy not the want for better service to the community.
The community is lucky to have people like you who hold all vendors to the same level of scrutiny :)

Again, thank you for the kind words and engaging in a constructive discussion, that's why we have these forums!
Was never meant to scrutinise even though the direction has moved that way, so i appreciate you holding me accountable for that and i would happily engage in constructive discussion with all vendors just like we have done here if it gives perspective to the community.

Hoping your shift in direction, once implemented, with testing encourages other labs to provide the same transparency.

Thank you brother, and thanks for the great discussion 🙏🤝
 
Good Evening Evo Family!

We hope all members are having a great week:)

We have more stock of the following;

- Peptide Pens
- Retatrutide 10mg

and limited stock of;

- Retatrutide 20mg

Any queries, please reach out to us on Threema TAFDKYCW
Get them boys and girls!!!! these won't last long
 
Good morning Evo Family!

We are are running a promo on our Retatrutide 10mg for $75/vial for the weekend :)

Contact

Threema ID:
F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888

Have a great weekend!
Awesome price man,Reta has become super popular most recently,can't beat a bargain like that Evo freaky freaks..
 
Good morning Evo Family!

We are are running a promo on our Retatrutide 10mg for $75/vial for the weekend :)

Contact

Threema ID:
F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888

Have a great weekend!
Christmas is sorted
 
Good Afternoon Evo Family!

Thanks to all the support over the weekend on our sale, it means a lot to us :).

Attached are resting results for the current batch we are selling. We are interested to see how these results compare to the Jano results expected next week.

As always, corroborate test results with images and batch numbers to ensure you are receiving the product that you are being provided test results for!

We wish you a good week and reach out with any enquiries! :)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251216-140806.webp
    Screenshot_20251216-140806.webp
    52.8 KB · Views: 111
  • Screenshot_20251216-140800.webp
    Screenshot_20251216-140800.webp
    52.4 KB · Views: 133
Yhank
Touchdown! Vendor has been awesome - super helpful and responsive! Even provided lab test results for the batch.

Ordered on the weekend, shipped yesterday, arrived today. Extemely happy with everything
Thank you for your support and contribution towards our goals :)

Please update us on your experience with the products in due course!
 
Just an appreciation post for @RRRaus for helping a couple of brothers out with a special order and come through with the goods was quick with dispatch and was keeping us updated all the way will definitely be reordering thanks again bro would recommend everyone give his products a go you will not be disappointed
Thank you for the kind words! I'm glad we could assist you with your needs:)
 
1st time order with @RRRaus and nothing but impressed, ordered over weekend with questions answered followed by lab test results matching batch no’s, shipped out Monday with a msg letting me know followed by another Tuesday telling me it should be delivered. Get home from work and there it is. Well packed and really looking the goods. He’s the real deal 👌🏼

IMG_1643.webp
IMG_1644.webp
 
1st time order with @RRRaus and nothing but impressed, ordered over weekend with questions answered followed by lab test results matching batch no’s, shipped out Monday with a msg letting me know followed by another Tuesday telling me it should be delivered. Get home from work and there it is. Well packed and really looking the goods. He’s the real deal 👌🏼

View attachment 156061View attachment 156062
Thank you for the review and keep us posted on your experience with the Reta!
 
Hello Evo community, we have some Christmas specials up and running!


These will be in effect to Christmas day or while stocks last.
  1. Min order $150, shipping $20 or free over $200!
  2. FREE peptide pen with all orders over $300. Limit 1 per person.
We are happy to price match like for like product😍

Stock list
Ipamorelin

• 5mg – $50 $40

GHK-Cu
• 100mg – $70 (kit $500)

PT-141
• 10mg – $45 $40

Cagrilintide
• 5mg – $70 $60

Retatrutide
• 10mg
Batch N25 - $90 ( Self tested 99%+ purity)
Batch D25 - $75 ( Supplier tested 99%+ Purity)

• 20mg
Batch N25– $150 ( self tested 99%+ purity)

Tirzepatide
• 20mg – $145 $120

BPC-157
• 10mg – $80 $70

TB-500 (TB4)
• 10mg – $90 $80

Reusable Peptide Pen
• $50

Payment via BTC

We expect more testing results over the coming weeks. Thank you for your support which enables us to provide the level of service that we deliver

Threema ID: F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888

We wish you a good end of week and a safe weekend.
 
Good Afternoon Evo Family!

Thanks to all the support over the weekend on our sale, it means a lot to us :).

Attached are resting results for the current batch we are selling. We are interested to see how these results compare to the Jano results expected next week.

As always, corroborate test results with images and batch numbers to ensure you are receiving the product that you are being provided test results for!

We wish you a good week and reach out with any enquiries! :)
Awesome results, nice work brother 🙏
 
Hello Evo community, we have some Christmas specials up and running!


These will be in effect to Christmas day or while stocks last.
  1. Min order $150, shipping $20 or free over $200!
  2. FREE peptide pen with all orders over $300. Limit 1 per person.
We are happy to price match like for like product😍

Stock list
Ipamorelin

• 5mg – $50 $40

GHK-Cu
• 100mg – $70 (kit $500)

PT-141
• 10mg – $45 $40

Cagrilintide
• 5mg – $70 $60

Retatrutide
• 10mg
Batch N25 - $90 ( Self tested 99%+ purity)
Batch D25 - $75 ( Supplier tested 99%+ Purity)

• 20mg
Batch N25– $150 ( self tested 99%+ purity)

Tirzepatide
• 20mg – $145 $120

BPC-157
• 10mg – $80 $70

TB-500 (TB4)
• 10mg – $90 $80

Reusable Peptide Pen
• $50

Payment via BTC

We expect more testing results over the coming weeks. Thank you for your support which enables us to provide the level of service that we deliver

Threema ID: F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888

We wish you a good end of week and a safe weekend.
awesome specials brothers get around him he knows his stuff have a chat and see for yourself
 
Thank you for the support:)

The colour scheme looks like something out of interior designs 😍
Jumped on the reta sale and grabbed 2 vials for a mate. Lovely presentation and next day delivery can’t ask for more. Vendor did reach out to let me know it was shipped and included a date to follow up if no land. Great service cheers mate
 
Happy Christmas to those who celebrate it in the evo family. We hope everyone takes the time to be be grateful for what they have and maintain their drive towards their goals well into the new year:)
Merry Christmas to you n your family.all the best mate.
 
Happy Christmas to those who celebrate it in the evo family. We hope everyone takes the time to be be grateful for what they have and maintain their drive towards their goals well into the new year:)
Merry Christmas brother
 
Ordered a big batch from RRR of BPC157, TB500, GHKCU and RETA. He threw in a free 10ml vial of BAC water as well!
Great communication, very open and frank and easy to chat to. Shipped it out immediately after payment, with tracking and it arrivied 2 business days later.

The Reta has a QR code in the back of the box that links to the corresponding purity test document as well. Really helped me lock in my purchase seeing the purity testing he conducted above.


Great process all the way through, thanks man.
 

Attachments

  • 20251224_153746.webp
    20251224_153746.webp
    533.7 KB · Views: 131
Ordered a big batch from RRR of BPC157, TB500, GHKCU and RETA. He threw in a free 10ml vial of BAC water as well!
Great communication, very open and frank and easy to chat to. Shipped it out immediately after payment, with tracking and it arrivied 2 business days later.

The Reta has a QR code in the back of the box that links to the corresponding purity test document as well. Really helped me lock in my purchase seeing the purity testing he conducted above.


Great process all the way through, thanks man.
One of the best peptides vendors I have seen in years.all quality products with top tier customer service,won't find better imo.
 
Jano tests have been returned for our previous 20mg Retatrutide and current BPC 10mg. We are awaiting results for our current 10mg Retatrutide.

These can be viewed in conjunction with the previous testing which was conducted with a different testing facility to observe the difference in results.

Please view the full report including pictures of the relevant batch:)

To authenticate the reports, either scan the QR code to be taken to the official Janoshik test website, or go to the website and enter the task number from the top left and the unique code at the bottom of the report.
 

Attachments

  • Test Report #95080 (3).webp
    Test Report #95080 (3).webp
    94.7 KB · Views: 116
  • Test Report #95081 (4).webp
    Test Report #95081 (4).webp
    94.9 KB · Views: 137
Good afternoon Evo members!

New stock in of 20mg Retatrutide - $130. Self testing pending for this batch.

Contact:
Threema ID: F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888
Good price
 
Jano tests have been returned for our previous 20mg Retatrutide and current BPC 10mg. We are awaiting results for our current 10mg Retatrutide.

These can be viewed in conjunction with the previous testing which was conducted with a different testing facility to observe the difference in results.

Please view the full report including pictures of the relevant batch:)

To authenticate the reports, either scan the QR code to be taken to the official Janoshik test website, or go to the website and enter the task number from the top left and the unique code at the bottom of the report.
amazing price bro, keen for my batch to come in
 
Good afternoon Evo members!

New stock in of 20mg Retatrutide - $130. Self testing pending for this batch.

Contact:
Threema ID: F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888
Dynamite price right there!
Jano tests have been returned for our previous 20mg Retatrutide and current BPC 10mg. We are awaiting results for our current 10mg Retatrutide.

These can be viewed in conjunction with the previous testing which was conducted with a different testing facility to observe the difference in results.

Please view the full report including pictures of the relevant batch:)

To authenticate the reports, either scan the QR code to be taken to the official Janoshik test website, or go to the website and enter the task number from the top left and the unique code at the bottom of the report.
Good work on this brother!
 
Jano tests have been returned for our previous 20mg Retatrutide and current BPC 10mg. We are awaiting results for our current 10mg Retatrutide.

These can be viewed in conjunction with the previous testing which was conducted with a different testing facility to observe the difference in results.

Please view the full report including pictures of the relevant batch:)

To authenticate the reports, either scan the QR code to be taken to the official Janoshik test website, or go to the website and enter the task number from the top left and the unique code at the bottom of the report.
Great results,I didn't expect anything less from this vendor.has been quality from day 1 with customer service to match.dont hesitate to choose RRRaus for all your peptide needs guys,best peptide vendor on Evo.
 

Attachments

  • Test Report #95240.webp
    Test Report #95240.webp
    96 KB · Views: 99
Happy belated new years Evo members:)

New year, new prices on our Reta/GH kits for those who haven't stocked up on the already great deals around!

10mg - $500 for 10 vials posted
20mg - $800 for 10 vials posted
100IU GH - $150/kit posted

We will be bringing some other kits at good pricing shortly :)

Threema ID: F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888
 
Happy belated new years Evo members:)

New year, new prices on our Reta/GH kits for those who haven't stocked up on the already great deals around!

10mg - $500 for 10 vials posted
20mg - $800 for 10 vials posted
100IU GH - $150/kit posted

We will be bringing some other kits at good pricing shortly :)

Threema ID: F4VC7KHJ (preferred)
Signal: RRRpeptides.888

Thats some aggressive pricing right here. Cant wait to see what you price the other kits at .

Keep them coming 👌
 
Thanks mate! Not aggressive enough from some feedback I've already received so we will be doing $400 for 10mg kit and $600 for 20mg kit over the weekend :)

It will reduce the profit margin albeit still profitable while allowing us to get some more items in :)
Thats some aggressive pricing right here. Cant wait to see what you price the other kits at .

Keep them coming
 
Back
Top Bottom