I think you are a good guy
@bigbadvuke and I respect that you are actually testing and thinking about risk, but I completely disagree on one big point here.
@BCGains is clearly using the anger and hardship of other guys to manipulate and control the narrative in this thread, that is not “neutral,” that is classic source rep behavior dressed up as community concern.
Really we do not have a dog in the fight on which Canadian lab “wins” this market. If
@SYNPharmaDist ends up being the guy he is the guy, if
@Fusion Canada is the guy he is the guy, if
@pur-pharma-canada is the guy he is the guy, and if a new brand proves itself over time it can join that list, but they all live or die by evidence not by who yells loudest for them.
Ultimately without logs and actual user feedback we cannot approve anything long term, that is not how EVO family does things, we need guys using the gear and posting training diet bloods and follow up tests over months, not just 1 off lab tests on a single lucky vial.
One vial tested “thoroughly” is still just one vial and you already said it yourself that the next one could be hay colored piss, that is exactly why we hammer the point that logs plus repeated bloods are king.
What bothers me is when someone like
@BCGains takes that normal process and twists it into “EVO only supports paid labs” while at the same time constantly repping growth guys brand and attacking anyone who questions it, that is where the line gets crossed.
Do your testing, keep logging and sharing, that is valuable, but please also see how the behavior around Growth Guys is not the same as a normal member posting data, and understand why we are pushing back on the rep games while still wanting more good Canadian options for everyone.
@BeMe @HarleyGuy @VerticallyChallenged @Bigswaz @Farmboy