Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
Research Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsResearch Chemical SciencesUGFREAKeudomestic

test cyp injections IM versus Subq - dosages

Just go with IM. Personally best if you ask me
 
Thanks, I could see rate/speed of absorbtion maybe being different but somehow it just seems counterintuitive that the actual amount itself being absorbed would be different. Then again, I'm not a doctor either :)

This is something I'll be doing on my own, not through a clinic. I'm just looking up various articles on dosing protocol and found it interesting that although you can do either IM or subq, within the very same articles it seems that subq seems to be always come out at lower total dosages over the same time frame. It just surprised me, because that implies greater absorption and bioavailability if it's into your fat rather than the muscle itself. It almost seems counterintuitive.
It is and I'm sure we covered this ground before. To me daily pinning and or sub-q is pointless.

Neither are 'better'. I've pointed out, for example, that the 'steady state' (aka an even level of testosterone) does NOTHING. No better gains, no more strength, no better fat loss. Heck perfectly normal levels vary through the day, week, month and year. And that's under normal conditions.

And why might sub-q be lesser doses - cos you don't want a 2ml bubble of test under the skin. It does NOT mean it's more available. That's what you wanna see vs the truth.

Just cos 'you can' doesn't make it better
 
I was also (I thought it was obvious) implying that a clinic who you pay MONEY too will always be keen to make more money, And daily jabs of a low dose make them more money so of course they looked at it.
 
Back
Top Bottom