Official community hplc testing

[TeeGee]

Here it is everyone.

Blind testing for our valued vendors,

Goal - provide transparency across the board and provide confidence with purchasing to members within the Aussie Evo family..

Process - Evo community group will contribute to the fund of testing our vendors through janoshik

Vendors tested in each round will be determined via wheel of names application to make it fair

Compounds to be tested will be matched and also determined via wheel of names

Example - labs A B C to have test e & mast e tested

Vendors will be encouraged to reimburse test expenses into the kitty to allow for future testing to become self funded. This allows routine to take place. No vendor will be forced. Only encouraged.

Disclaimer - one good result does not mean a vendor is g2g for life.. this is why we hope to make this a regular routine within the community.

Anyone who isn't involved in the community group and wishes to be, please let me know

Special thanks to @Freki - for his efforts reaching out to the janoshik team and working on making good deals regarding testing expenses.

This plan has great potential but also involves alot of trust. This is why the group has loggers from each and every vendor and the most reputable forum members are all a part of it.

@AE1079 @Allupfromhere @bullybreed @BigCheese2000 @codezz @coolguy77711 @Corn Gromwell @CypherOCE @DinoSaur @Don Kong @Dumptruck @Eveflorence @fatboy999 @Freki @Grumpy @Heavygripper @juddy @Limros @Menzy @Oracle911 @Pigsy @Ratatata @Robules @Trenhead3cc @Wheelhouse87 @Woodiee

Vendors - @UGL OZ @UGL OZ Support Rep @R&Dpharma @Liquid Gold Labs @Raptor Labs @ODINLABS @Core Pharma @GENTEXLaboratories @Anabolic Advancements @KAOS Anabolics @Sassy's Pharmaceuticals @bigdawg1 @ZenithHealth @Driven-Nutrition @hairlossgod

The voice

 

[Grumpy]

Well done @TeeGee and @Freki thanks for all the hard work put into this so far

 

[TeeGee]

Well done @TeeGee and @Freki thanks for all the hard work put into this so far

Team effort brother !! I'm just the guy throwing up the thread hahhaa. Credit goes to all involved

 

[Woodiee]

Well explained teegee, the true voice! This will benefit not only the community but its a good selling point for the vendors when they pass.. we know we have a great selection of trusted vendors right now and our motive isn't to try and expose them by any means.

 

[Freki]

one good result does not mean a vendor is g2g for life..

And just to add 1 poor result does not mean a vendor is not good to go.

Thanks @TeeGee for doing what you do, and also to all who contributed, i thought there was great input from the group, with everyone on board.

 

[Corn Gromwell]

Thanks for getting this off the ground legends, stoked to be involved

 

[TeeGee]

We will let the community give input for the next few days or reach out if wanting to be a part of things..

Towards end of the week the ball will begin to roll and put the plan into effort and we will see how well it all goes..

Thanks again everyone

 

[Yuri]

U

Team effort brother !! I'm just the guy throwing up the thread hahhaa. Credit goes to all involved

You’re more then a just a pretty face

 

[Freki]

@Eddie Haskell
Hey bro can you just clarify if this randomised testing is something that will be allowed to be posted on EVO?
We are seeing a lot of support from loggers and vendors alike for this first round.

 

[Eddie Haskell]

@Eddie Haskell
Hey bro can you just clarify if this randomised testing is something that will be allowed to be posted on EVO?
We are seeing a lot of support from loggers and vendors alike for this first round.

Yes, we can't stop it, it would look like we are hiding something, when there is nothing to hide. @Freki
The best approach in situations like this is full transparency. Therefore, I hope everyone involved in this project can post here and be open about it.

This thread is an offshoot of this original plan:
https://www.evolutionary.org/forums/threads/evo-hplc-vendor-testing-group.104595/

I posted my views before:
I’ve been open before about my views on HPLC or any testing. It’s just 1 vial in 1 batch at that 1 time, it does no service to the vendor, neither does it prove or disprove quality.

Janoshik is a protection racket for the worst out there these days.
I’m open and clear about my views @TeeGee
https://www.evolutionary.org/forums/threads/evo-hplc-vendor-testing-group.104595/post-1745553

I’ve been open before about my views on HPLC or any testing. It’s just 1 vial in 1 batch at that 1 time, it does no service to the vendor, neither does it prove or disprove quality.

Janoshik is a protection racket for the worst out there these days.
I’m open and clear about my views @TeeGee

 

[Eddie Haskell]

Yes, we can't stop it, it would look like we are hiding something, when there is nothing to hide. @Freki
The best approach in situations like this is full transparency. Therefore, I hope everyone involved in this project can post here and be open about it.

This thread is an offshoot of this original plan:
https://www.evolutionary.org/forums/threads/evo-hplc-vendor-testing-group.104595/

I posted my views before:
I’ve been open before about my views on HPLC or any testing. It’s just 1 vial in 1 batch at that 1 time, it does no service to the vendor, neither does it prove or disprove quality.

Janoshik is a protection racket for the worst out there these days.
I’m open and clear about my views @TeeGee
https://www.evolutionary.org/forums/threads/evo-hplc-vendor-testing-group.104595/post-1745553

The above is said, but I do support @TeeGee in his plan to move this project forward.

 

[Freki]

Janoshik is a protection racket for the worst out there these days.

Thanks for reply Eddie, I dont understand this point, I saw you post it before can you elaborate

 

[Eddie Haskell]

Thanks for reply Eddie, I dont understand this point, I saw you post it before can you elaborate

They give legitimacy to 1 bottle from 1 batch, not the entire lab/vendor. However, users are made to believe a jano hplc determines quality of all batches, it doesn’t. @Freki

 

[Freki]

However, users are made to believe a jano hplc determines quality of all batches,

I don't think people are that naive , but then again maybe we all are

 

[juddy]

I don't think people are that naive , but then again maybe we all are

Aussie Crew all have a little bit of Injustice Sensitivity...

We're looking out for our own and this reflects in how we direct blow ins (non active/ new members) on where to go.

 

[Freki]

Aussie Crew all have a little bit of Injustice Sensitivity...

Just a little bit that's me 24 7 lol
Hit the nail on the head

 

[TeeGee]

The above is said, but I do support @TeeGee in his plan to move this project forward.

Our plan *

I am just a member of the group involved brother. Cannot take credit

 

[TeeGee]

A single test does not give a lab g2g status to infinity and beyond. This ain't buzz lightyear..

This is why we have high hopes to implement this as a routine testing system which continues to give clarity throughout stages of the year..

 

[Eddie Haskell]

I don't think people are that naive , but then again maybe we all are

I’m talking about 1,600,000 visitors per month, many new guys who know nothing. Those are the users I’m referring to. @Freki

 

[juddy]

I’m talking about 1,600,000 visitors per month, many new guys who know nothing. Those are the users I’m referring to. @Freki

Is that just the Aussie section or the entire forum?

I dont believe 6% of Australia accessed the Aussie section last month is all.