This sounds like a demoralization attempt.
I asked
@Mobster to tell me why he doesn't want me to use steroids. He said multiple times that he is against steroid use before the age of 25 and the end of the HPTA development.
When he talks about HPTA and age of 25, he most likely refers to endocrine system development and the fact that if that system is disrupted, I may need a TRT for life and remain sterile. In response, I said that sterility and TRT for life are trade offs I'm willing to do.
TRT for life and sterility aren't enough to scare me. These aren't serious side effect, in my perspective.
So are sterility and TRT for life the complications you are talking about? If yes, know I'm not afraid of these "complications".
Anyway, feel free to list the complications you think I haven't thought about. I will be happy to see them and think about the risks.
Why did you chose not to? If you really wanted to educate me, you would have told me what the health issues are.
So, don't explain me anything in details, just list the names of the health issues you think I will get if I use steroids before the age of 25.
I will start with a minimal TRT dose (80-100 ng a week), and at the end of the first week, I will test my testosterone level to see the ng/dL amount. That's how I will now if the minimal dose works the way I want it to work.
Yes, I will have tamoxifen just in case. I steroids cycle with primobolan and a TRT dose is very unlikely to cause gynecomastia.
Primobolan lowers estrogen because it lowers natural testosterone production, and aromatization can't happen without testosterone. That's why I will use testosterone during the cycle. If I take primobolan and it shuts down my natural T production, the TRT dose is what will keep my testosterone levels within normal range so aromatization can continue and estrogen and e2 are kept within normal range, ok? That's how it works, ok?